Story perspectives

India's Supreme Court Rejects Social Media Age Restriction

4/4/2025

44 9

Summary

Story summary

The Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition to restrict social media access for children under 13, stating it's a matter for Parliament to address. The Zep Foundation raised concerns over the mental health risks of social media for minors, advocating for stronger age verification and parental controls. The court encouraged the petitioner to seek further action with relevant authorities.

History

Historical Context

The Supreme Court of India's recent decision mirrors historical debates on child protection and technology, reminiscent of the 2018 ruling that established the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right. This case emphasized individual autonomy in digital spaces, reflecting ongoing tensions between state regulation and personal freedom, particularly concerning minors' access to social media and the need for legislative action to ensure their safety.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Supreme Court of India has rejected a petition to restrict social media access for children under 13, stating it's a matter for Parliament to address. The Zep Foundation raised concerns over the mental health risks of social media for minors, advocating for stronger age verification and parental controls. The court encouraged the petitioner to seek further action with relevant authorities.

1 / 2