Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Lawyer's AI Avatar Backfires in Controversial Court Case

4/6/2025

24 3

Summary

Story summary

Jerome Dewald sparked controversy in a New York court on March 26 when he used a fictional AI avatar to present his case. The judges swiftly recognized the deception, leading Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels to stop the video. In a heartfelt apology, Dewald explained he aimed to improve his argument delivery amid his speech challenges.

History

Historical Context

Jerome Dewald's use of a fictional AI avatar in a New York court on March 26 echoes past courtroom controversies involving deception. In the 2010 JetBlue incident, flight attendant Steven Slater's dramatic exit highlighted the pressures faced by airline staff. Both cases reveal the intersection of personal struggles and public accountability, reflecting ongoing debates about mental health and professionalism in high-stress environments.

1 of 2

Story summary

Jerome Dewald sparked controversy in a New York court on March 26 when he used a fictional AI avatar to present his case. The judges swiftly recognized the deception, leading Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels to stop the video. In a heartfelt apology, Dewald explained he aimed to improve his argument delivery amid his speech challenges.

1 / 2