Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Federal Troops Deployed to LA: Legal Battle Ensues

6/18/2025

50 4

Left

Trump's Troop Deployment

In a controversial move, President Trump sent nearly 5,000 federal troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids, facing strong local backlash. A district court ruled the deployment illegal, leading to minimal impact and hefty expenses. Now, a federal appeals court is scrutinizing the legality of this military intervention in domestic affairs.

Right

Newsom Challenges Troop Deployment

The Ninth Circuit Court is examining Governor Gavin Newsom's challenge to President Trump's controversial deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles during protests. Judges are probing the necessity of state consent for federalizing troops, a pivotal moment that stirs echoes of the historic 1827 Martin v. Mott case, spotlighting the ongoing tug-of-war between federal and state authority.

History

Historical Context

The 1827 Supreme Court case Martin v. Mott established that states maintain authority over their militias, limiting federal troop deployment without state consent. This principle is now challenged by President Trump's deployment of nearly 5,000 federal troops to Los Angeles in 2020, reflecting ongoing tensions between federal and state powers and raising significant questions about military intervention in domestic affairs.

1 of 3

Trump's Troop Deployment

In a controversial move, President Trump sent nearly 5,000 federal troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids, facing strong local backlash. A district court ruled the deployment illegal, leading to minimal impact and hefty expenses. Now, a federal appeals court is scrutinizing the legality of this military intervention in domestic affairs.

1 / 3