Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Justice Jackson Slams Supreme Court's Favoritism for Corporations

6/21/2025

26 6

Summary

Story summary

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson passionately dissented, cautioning that the Supreme Court is prioritizing the interests of the wealthy at the expense of the vulnerable. In the Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA case, she condemned the ruling that permits gas companies to challenge California's emissions standards, asserting it jeopardizes judicial integrity and tilts the scales in favor of corporate power.

1 of 1

Story summary

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson passionately dissented, cautioning that the Supreme Court is prioritizing the interests of the wealthy at the expense of the vulnerable. In the Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA case, she condemned the ruling that permits gas companies to challenge California's emissions standards, asserting it jeopardizes judicial integrity and tilts the scales in favor of corporate power.