Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Coalition's Climate Policy Under Scrutiny as Barnaby Joyce's Bill Debates Begin

8/26/2025, 5:02:43 PM

Internal Divisions Emerge Over Net Zero Target

The Australian Coalition is facing significant internal conflict regarding its climate policy as the House of Representatives prepares to debate Barnaby Joyce's private member's bill aimed at repealing the country's net zero emissions target by 2050. This debate, set for Monday, follows a recent motion passed by the Queensland Liberal National Party to abandon the net zero commitment, igniting ideological tensions within the Coalition.

Joyce's bill, formally known as the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, seeks to dismantle key legislation underpinning Australia's emissions reduction framework. It proposes the complete repeal of five acts, including the Climate Change Act 2022 and the Net Zero Economy Authority Act 2024, while amending three others to eliminate references to net zero. Joyce has argued that the transition to renewable energy has not only failed to yield significant climate benefits but has also imposed financial burdens on households.

Key Figures and Their Positions

Barnaby Joyce, a Nationals backbencher, has emerged as a prominent figure opposing the net zero target, claiming it represents "economic sabotage." He is supported by several conservative MPs, including Matt Canavan and Llew O’Brien, who have voiced concerns that the current climate policies are detrimental to regional communities and economic productivity. O’Brien emphasized that rejecting net zero does not equate to denying climate change, stating, “What is real is the lives of business people who are trying to survive in this country.”

Conversely, moderate voices within the Coalition, such as Liberal senator Andrew McLachlan, advocate for maintaining the net zero commitment, arguing that supporting pollution reduction targets is not a weakness. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has attempted to manage the tensions, ordering an internal review of the Coalition's energy policies.

Official Statements and Responses

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has criticized the Coalition's internal strife, asserting that abandoning the net zero target would imply a denial of climate change. He stated, “If you get rid of net zero, you are saying climate change is not real.” Albanese's government has also been accused of using the debate to highlight the Coalition's divisions, with Labor MPs labeling the bill as out of touch with public sentiment.

In response to the bill, Labor MP Ali France described it as “bizarre,” arguing that it contradicts the will of the electorate, particularly after the recent election results showed a shift towards climate-conscious voting.

Criticism and Opposition

Critics of Joyce's bill have raised concerns about its implications for Australia's climate action and economic future. Labor's Susan Templeman and independent MP Zali Steggall have both condemned the bill, with Steggall referring to Joyce as a “fossil” and asserting that the Coalition's stance is increasingly irrelevant. The Greens have called for an inquiry into the government's handling of climate risk assessments, emphasizing the need for a robust framework to address climate challenges.

What's Next

As the debate unfolds, the Coalition's future stance on climate policy remains uncertain. The government is expected to announce its 2035 emissions target soon, which will further shape the landscape of Australia's climate action. The outcome of Joyce's bill and the internal reviews within the Coalition will likely have lasting implications for the party's direction and public perception regarding climate change.