Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Controversial Gaza Plan: The GREAT Trust Proposal

9/3/2025, 1:07:22 AM

Overview of the GREAT Trust Proposal

A leaked 38-page document from the Trump administration outlines a controversial plan, dubbed the Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration, and Transformation Trust (GREAT), which envisions transforming Gaza into a high-tech tourism and manufacturing hub. The proposal suggests a U.S. trusteeship over the territory for at least a decade, during which the entire population of over two million Gazans would be temporarily relocated, either to other countries or into secured zones within Gaza.

Key Features of the Plan

The GREAT Trust plan aims to create a series of AI-powered megacities and luxury resorts, likened to a "Gaza Riviera." It proposes offering landowners digital tokens in exchange for their property rights, which could be redeemed for housing in the new developments or used to finance relocation. The initiative is projected to attract $100 billion in private investment, with anticipated annual revenues exceeding $4.5 billion by the tenth year.

Criticism and Opposition

The plan has faced widespread condemnation from various quarters. Critics, including human rights organizations and Palestinian officials, have labeled it as a thinly veiled attempt at ethnic cleansing. Philip Grant, executive director of Trial International, described it as a "blueprint for mass deportation, marketed as development," warning that it could lead to international legal repercussions for those involved. Hamas officials have outright rejected the proposal, asserting that "Gaza is not for sale" and emphasizing the need for Palestinian sovereignty.

Official Statements & Responses

The White House has remained largely silent on the specifics of the GREAT Trust proposal. However, the plan reportedly emerged from discussions involving former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, indicating a collaborative effort to reshape Gaza's future. Critics argue that the plan reflects a broader U.S. strategy that disregards Palestinian self-determination, with one analyst stating, "the details of the plan were so clearly ludicrous that the proposal should not be taken seriously at face value."

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

There are discrepancies regarding the extent of the proposed population relocation. While some sources indicate a complete temporary relocation, others suggest that approximately 75% of Gaza's population would remain during the transformation. Additionally, the plan's feasibility has been questioned, particularly in light of ongoing violence and humanitarian crises in the region.

Broader Implications

The GREAT Trust proposal raises significant concerns about the future of Gaza and its inhabitants. Legal experts have criticized the plan as a violation of international humanitarian law, arguing that any displacement that undermines the right of return for Palestinians is inherently illegal. The plan's framing as a development initiative has been described as a façade for colonial ambitions, with potential long-term impacts on regional stability and Palestinian identity.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “This is a blueprint for mass deportation, marketed as development.” — Philip Grant, Executive Director, Trial International
  • “Gaza is not for sale” — Basem Naim, Senior Hamas Official
  • “The US has made clear since February [when details of plans for a Trump Riviera in Gaza first emerged] that they are OK with the idea of ethnic cleansing in Gaza.” — HA Hellyer, Senior Associate, Royal United Services Institute

The GREAT Trust proposal continues to provoke intense debate and scrutiny, highlighting the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the contentious nature of international intervention in the region.