Story perspectives

NCAA Athletes Sue Over Redshirt Rule, Claim Antitrust Violations

9/3/2025

Summary

Story summary

A class-action lawsuit by 10 NCAA athletes challenges the redshirt rule, alleging antitrust violations.
The rule limits athletes' competition and NIL income opportunities, forcing choices between immediate play and a fifth year.
Co-lead attorney Ryan Downton states the lawsuit seeks to allow competition during all five eligibility years.
The NCAA defends its rules as essential for balancing academics and athletics, suggesting legislative changes.
The lawsuit aims to include Division I athletes enrolled from fall 2022 onward, potentially impacting thousands.

History

Historical Context

The 1984 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in NCAA v. Board of Regents allowed universities to negotiate their own television contracts, breaking the NCAA's monopoly and increasing competition. This decision led to a surge in NCAA revenue, from $1.5 billion in 2010 to over $1.1 billion in 2020. Current lawsuits by NCAA athletes challenge restrictions like the redshirt rule, potentially reshaping athlete rights.

1 of 2

Story summary

A class-action lawsuit by 10 NCAA athletes challenges the redshirt rule, alleging antitrust violations.
The rule limits athletes' competition and NIL income opportunities, forcing choices between immediate play and a fifth year.
Co-lead attorney Ryan Downton states the lawsuit seeks to allow competition during all five eligibility years.
The NCAA defends its rules as essential for balancing academics and athletics, suggesting legislative changes.
The lawsuit aims to include Division I athletes enrolled from fall 2022 onward, potentially impacting thousands.

1 / 2