Full Breakdown
Nepal's Home Minister Resigns Amid Deadly Protests Over Social Media Ban
9/9/2025, 5:53:26 AM
Escalation of Protests and Resignation
Nepal's Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak resigned on September 8, 2025, following violent protests that resulted in at least 19 deaths and over 400 injuries. The protests, primarily led by youth under the banner of "Gen Z," erupted in response to the government's ban on 26 major social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter). The ban was implemented after these platforms failed to register with the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology within a specified deadline, a move perceived by many as an attack on free expression.
During an emergency cabinet meeting at Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's residence in Baluwatar, Lekhak cited moral responsibility for the loss of life as the reason for his resignation. He stated, “Many lives were lost in [Monday’s] protests. The moral responsibility lies with me. For the sake of morality, I do not wish to remain in office.” His resignation came amid mounting pressure from within his party, the Nepali Congress, where leaders had openly demanded his stepping down.
Background of the Protests
The protests began as an online movement against the social media ban but quickly escalated into widespread demonstrations against government corruption and authoritarian governance. Thousands of young people, including students, took to the streets of Kathmandu and other cities, chanting slogans such as "Shut down corruption, not social media" and "Youths against corruption." The protests turned violent when demonstrators attempted to breach the Parliament complex, leading to clashes with security forces.
In response to the escalating violence, police deployed tear gas, water cannons, and live ammunition. Reports indicate that 17 fatalities occurred in Kathmandu, with two additional deaths in Itahari, Sunsari district. Hospitals across the country struggled to cope with the influx of injured protesters, many suffering from gunshot wounds.
Government Response and Criticism
Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli defended the government's actions, asserting that the ban was necessary to regulate social media platforms and protect national security. He characterized the protesters as "troublemakers" and refused to lift the ban, stating that any attempt to undermine the nation would not be tolerated. However, the government's stance has drawn widespread condemnation from human rights activists and opposition parties, who have criticized the use of lethal force against demonstrators.
The United Nations has called for a prompt and transparent investigation into the killings, while the Computer Association of Nepal warned that the ban could severely disrupt education, business, and communication for millions of citizens.
What's Next?
In a significant development following the protests, the Nepalese government announced the lifting of the social media ban, allowing access to the previously restricted platforms. The Ministry of Information has initiated the process to restore these services, responding to the demands of the youth-led protests. However, the political landscape remains tense, with ongoing calls for accountability and reform in governance.
As the situation evolves, the government's next steps will be critical in determining whether further unrest will occur or if a path toward dialogue and resolution can be established. The events mark a pivotal moment in Nepal's political history, reflecting the deep frustrations of a generation seeking change.
