Full Breakdown
Matt Rhule Advocates for FBS-FCS Matchups in College Football
9/12/2025, 1:09:35 AM
The Core Argument for FBS-FCS Games
Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule has publicly endorsed the practice of Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) teams playing against Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) teams. Rhule, who has experience coaching at the FCS level, argues that these matchups are essential for the financial stability of smaller programs. He stated, “FCS schools depend on playing FBS teams... It’s hard to fund your football team. It’s hard to fund the rest of it.” This sentiment reflects a broader understanding of the financial dynamics within college football, where FBS teams often provide significant monetary support to their FCS counterparts through scheduled games.
Financial Implications of FBS-FCS Matchups
The financial arrangements for these games can be substantial. For instance, Nebraska is set to pay FCS Houston Christian $500,000 for their upcoming game, while Ohio State recently paid Grambling State $1 million for a matchup. Such payments are crucial for FCS programs, which often struggle to secure funding. Rhule emphasized that these games create a "win-win" situation: FBS teams typically enhance their win-loss records, while FCS teams receive vital financial support.
Mixed Reactions and Scheduling Trends
Despite Rhule's advocacy, opinions on FBS-FCS matchups are mixed within the college football community. While some argue that these games dilute the competitive integrity of college football, others recognize their necessity for funding. Notably, only 10 of the 136 FBS schools are not scheduled to play FCS teams, with prominent institutions like Michigan, UCLA, and Notre Dame opting out. Rhule has opposed any potential Big Ten rule that would prohibit such matchups, citing the strategic benefits observed in the Southeastern Conference (SEC), which often schedules FCS opponents late in the season to prepare for playoff runs.
Recent FCS Successes Against FBS Teams
The trend of FCS teams defeating FBS opponents has gained traction, with four FCS teams achieving victories over FBS teams in the current season alone. Notable upsets include Tarleton State's win over Army and Austin Peay's victory against Middle Tennessee State. However, it is worth noting that no FCS team has defeated a Power Five team in recent years, with the last such upset occurring in 2021 when Montana defeated No. 20 Washington.
Official Statements & Responses
Rhule's stance on FBS-FCS matchups aligns with his experiences in the FCS, where financial sustainability is often a challenge. He remarked, “I just think if it was up to me... everything would be similar... It would just all be similar so that it’s easy to compare.” This perspective underscores the need for a balanced approach to scheduling that considers both competitive integrity and financial realities.
What's Next for Nebraska
As Nebraska prepares to face Houston Christian, Rhule's team is looking to build momentum before entering a challenging Big Ten schedule that includes matchups against Michigan and Michigan State. The upcoming game serves as a critical opportunity for Nebraska to solidify its standing while also contributing to the financial health of an FCS program.
In conclusion, Rhule's advocacy for FBS-FCS matchups highlights the complex interplay between competition and financial necessity in college football, a dynamic that continues to shape the landscape of the sport.
