Story perspectives

Michigan's Real ID Sparks Concerns Over Racial Profiling

9/13/2025

Summary

Story summary

Michigan's Real ID does not confirm citizenship, according to the Secretary of State's Office.
Advocates warn that heightened immigration enforcement may lead to racial profiling of U.S. citizens.
The Supreme Court's decision allows ICE to detain individuals based on appearance, raising further concerns.
Critics claim ICE's practices result in wrongful detentions of U.S. citizens.
Louisiana's Secretary of State found no evidence of systemic non-citizen voting issues.

History

Historical Context

In 2012, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona's immigration law, allowing local authorities to check immigration status, which raised concerns about racial profiling. The ACLU reported that 75% of individuals detained by ICE were U.S. citizens or lawful residents. This historical context parallels ongoing debates over Michigan's Real ID, highlighting persistent issues of civil rights and wrongful detentions in immigration enforcement.

1 of 2

Story summary

Michigan's Real ID does not confirm citizenship, according to the Secretary of State's Office.
Advocates warn that heightened immigration enforcement may lead to racial profiling of U.S. citizens.
The Supreme Court's decision allows ICE to detain individuals based on appearance, raising further concerns.
Critics claim ICE's practices result in wrongful detentions of U.S. citizens.
Louisiana's Secretary of State found no evidence of systemic non-citizen voting issues.

1 / 2