Story perspectives

Macrons Sue Candace Owens for Defamation Over Conspiracy Claims

9/18/2025

Summary

Story summary

The Macrons' lawsuit against Candace Owens seeks punitive damages and a jury trial, claiming she ignored credible evidence and spread conspiracy theories.
Their attorney, Tom Clare, plans to present photographic and scientific evidence, including family photos, to refute Owens' claims.
Owens' legal team seeks dismissal, citing jurisdiction and statute-of-limitations issues, arguing the case does not belong in Delaware.
Emmanuel Macron views the lawsuit as a matter of personal honor, condemning misuse of free speech to disseminate falsehoods.
The Macrons are appealing a French ruling that overturned their prior defamation victory against bloggers.

History

Historical Context

In 2013, the French Supreme Court reinforced protections for public figures in defamation cases, allowing individuals like Emmanuel Macron to combat misinformation. This legal framework became crucial when the Macrons sued Candace Owens in 2025 for defamation over false claims regarding Brigitte Macron's gender. The case underscores the ongoing struggle between free speech and accountability in an era of rampant misinformation.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Macrons' lawsuit against Candace Owens seeks punitive damages and a jury trial, claiming she ignored credible evidence and spread conspiracy theories.
Their attorney, Tom Clare, plans to present photographic and scientific evidence, including family photos, to refute Owens' claims.
Owens' legal team seeks dismissal, citing jurisdiction and statute-of-limitations issues, arguing the case does not belong in Delaware.
Emmanuel Macron views the lawsuit as a matter of personal honor, condemning misuse of free speech to disseminate falsehoods.
The Macrons are appealing a French ruling that overturned their prior defamation victory against bloggers.

1 / 2