Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

The Rise of Mercantilism: A Clash Between the U.S. and China

9/27/2025, 12:26:30 PM

Understanding the Shift to Mercantilism

Under the administration of President Donald Trump, the United States has adopted a mercantilist approach to trade, reminiscent of 17th-century economic policies that prioritize self-sufficiency and a favorable balance of exports over imports. This shift, encapsulated in the "America First" doctrine, aims to restore American manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign goods. However, this strategy faces significant challenges, particularly from China, which has been practicing mercantilism effectively for decades.

China's Established Mercantilism

Since its accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, China has developed a sophisticated mercantilist strategy. Initially, it maintained an artificially low currency to boost exports, but as its economy evolved, it transitioned to a model that emphasizes dominance in high-growth industries. By 2022, China produced over 70% of the world's electric vehicles and a substantial majority of solar technology components, according to the International Energy Agency. This forward-looking approach contrasts sharply with the U.S.'s backward-looking policies aimed at reviving past manufacturing glory.

The Impact of U.S. Tariffs

The tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on April 2, 2018, intended to protect American industries, have not led to the anticipated retaliation from other nations. Instead, they have resulted in a significant shift in trade dynamics, with China responding by increasing exports to other markets at competitive prices, a practice known as "dumping." Despite facing a 57% tariff on exports to the U.S., China's overall exports have reached record levels, demonstrating its ability to adapt and thrive under pressure.

Economic Consequences and Criticism

Critics argue that the U.S. mercantilist policies are not only ineffective but also detrimental to the global economy. Neil Shearing, chief economist at Capital Economics, suggests that the real forces reshaping trade are emanating from Beijing rather than Washington. The U.S. strategy may inadvertently lead to increased global competition and overcapacity, particularly as China seeks to offload surplus products onto international markets.

Official Statements & Responses

The Trump administration has maintained that its trade policies are essential for restoring American manufacturing and addressing the challenges posed by countries like China. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains in question, as the U.S. struggles to compete in emerging technologies and green energy sectors, where China has established a significant lead.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “0 — artificially cheap currency and gaming the WTO Magnus of Oxford University argues that the US is making a belated response to the path that China has blazed since at least the mid-2000s.” — George Magnus, Oxford University
  • “As Watling says, China’s cost of producing electricity now stands to be less than half that of the US.” — Chris Watling, Longview Economics
  • “The aim is a return to a previous era of American greatness.” — Analysis of Trump’s trade policies

Conclusion: The Future of U.S.-China Trade Relations

As the U.S. continues to navigate its mercantilist policies, the competition with China is likely to intensify. With China’s established expertise in mercantilism and its advancements in critical industries, the U.S. may face significant challenges in maintaining its economic position on the global stage. The outcome of this trade conflict will have lasting implications for both nations and the international economic landscape.