Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

California's SB 771 Sparks Debate on Hate Speech and Free Speech

9/28/2025

50 9 Full Breakdown

Center

California's Social Media Bill

California's SB 771 would penalize social media platforms for promoting hate speech, prompting debate over free-speech implications.
Critics, including Spencer Pratt (former MTV star), warn the measure could lead to censorship and curb online expression.
Proponents say the bill targets harmful speech rather than general expression, but tech platforms such as X and Parler resist; experts foresee First Amendment challenges.

Right

Hook Reinstated: Free Speech

A federal judge temporarily reinstated University of South Dakota professor Michael Hook after he criticized Charlie Kirk, citing First Amendment protections.
Hook's lawsuit alleges retaliation for exercising First Amendment rights.
Legal experts debate free-speech limits in schooling as educators face terminations over posts about Charlie Kirk's assassination.
The Oskaloosa Community School District says it followed laws in Kargol's termination.

History

Historical Context

The U.S. Supreme Court's 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan established the "actual malice" standard for defamation, enhancing free speech protections. This decision resonates with California's SB 771, which seeks to regulate hate speech online, reflecting ongoing tensions between free expression and accountability. Historical struggles, such as the 1912 San Diego free speech fight, underscore the complexities of these issues.

1 of 3

California's Social Media Bill

California's SB 771 would penalize social media platforms for promoting hate speech, prompting debate over free-speech implications.
Critics, including Spencer Pratt (former MTV star), warn the measure could lead to censorship and curb online expression.
Proponents say the bill targets harmful speech rather than general expression, but tech platforms such as X and Parler resist; experts foresee First Amendment challenges.

1 / 3