Impact of U.S. Humanitarian Aid Cuts on Women and Girls in Uganda

The cuts to U.S. humanitarian assistance under President Donald Trump have significantly impacted vulnerable populations, particularly women and girls in Uganda. In the Rwamwanja refugee settlement, aid reductions have led to a sharp decline in food assistance and educational resources, resulting in a notable increase in school dropouts among girls. David Mugenyi, the settlement’s commandant, reported that the proportion of schoolchildren who are girls has dropped from nearly 50% to only about 25%. Families facing economic hardship are prioritizing boys' education, forcing girls to take on domestic responsibilities or marry early.

New York Times

Alice Mugisha, a girl married against her will due to financial strain, exemplifies the dire situation. Her father, Francis Twagira, expressed regret but justified the marriage by stating, “If aid was still coming, Alice would remain with us.” This sentiment reflects a broader trend where families resort to marrying off daughters as a means of economic survival. Similarly, 14-year-old Shamim, who became pregnant after being raped, highlighted the increased vulnerability of girls to sexual violence amid the chaos resulting from aid cuts.

New York Times

The reduction in funding has severely affected health services, particularly reproductive health care. The U.S. has defunded the U.N. Population Fund and slashed family planning resources, leading to a rise in unplanned pregnancies and maternal deaths. Judith Mbabazi, a woman living with HIV, lamented the lack of access to essential medications, stating, “My life is in danger.” The Guttmacher Institute estimates that each $10 million reduction in international family planning spending results in an additional 362,000 unplanned pregnancies and 718 maternal deaths.

New York Times

The ramifications of these aid cuts extend beyond individual suffering. The collapse of health services and educational opportunities threatens to destabilize communities, as evidenced by increased crime rates and social disintegration. The cuts have not only harmed women and girls but have also negatively affected men and boys, who face deteriorating health care options. The ethical argument for maintaining aid is clear: humanitarian assistance saves lives and fosters stability, which ultimately benefits everyone.

New York Times

While the immediate effects of aid cuts are devastating, some argue that they may prompt African governments to rethink their health policies and invest more in local solutions. Kennedy Odede, founder of Shining Hope for Communities, noted that community-based organizations are stepping up to fill the gaps left by reduced funding. He emphasized the need for local governments to take charge of their health services, suggesting that this could lead to long-term benefits despite the current hardships.

How African communities are responding to the aid cuts

• “Only about one-quarter of our schoolchildren are girls now,” — David Mugenyi, Settlement Commandant

New York Times

• “If aid was still coming, Alice would remain with us.” — Francis Twagira, Alice's Father

New York Times

• “My life is in danger,” — Judith Mbabazi, HIV Patient

New York Times

The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Uganda underscores the urgent need for continued support and a reevaluation of U.S. foreign aid policies to protect the most vulnerable populations.

New York Times