Story perspectives

Drake's Defamation Lawsuit Against Universal Dismissed by Court

10/12/2025

Summary

Story summary

A U.S. federal court dismissed Drake's defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar's diss track Not Like Us.
Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled the lyrics, which contain serious accusations against Drake, are protected opinions rather than verifiable facts, given the heated rap context.
The court also dismissed Drake's claims of harassment and deceptive practices.
Universal Music Group expressed satisfaction with the ruling, while Drake's team announced plans to appeal.

History

Historical Context

The 1989 Supreme Court ruling in "Texas v. Johnson" affirmed that expressive conduct, including artistic expression, is protected under the First Amendment. This decision established that controversial opinions do not equate to defamation if not presented as facts. The recent dismissal of Drake's lawsuit against Universal Music Group reflects this precedent, emphasizing the legal protection of artistic expression in music and free speech.

1 of 2

Story summary

A U.S. federal court dismissed Drake's defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar's diss track Not Like Us.
Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled the lyrics, which contain serious accusations against Drake, are protected opinions rather than verifiable facts, given the heated rap context.
The court also dismissed Drake's claims of harassment and deceptive practices.
Universal Music Group expressed satisfaction with the ruling, while Drake's team announced plans to appeal.

1 / 2