Story perspectives

Supreme Court Case Could Undermine Voting Rights Act

10/15/2025

Summary

Story summary

Louisiana v. Callais, before the Supreme Court, could weaken Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
The map was redrawn to create two majority-Black districts after a suit claimed the prior map violated the VRA.
Opponents say the new map discriminates against non-Black voters.
A ruling against the VRA could allow redistricting without race considerations and flip up to 19 Democratic-to-Republican seats while diminishing minority representation.

History

Historical Context

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a landmark legislation aimed at eliminating racial discrimination in voting, particularly in Southern states. Following its passage, Black voter registration in Mississippi rose dramatically from 6.7% in 1964 to 59.8% by 1967. However, the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County v. Holder weakened these protections, leading to potential new restrictions on minority voting rights, as seen in the ongoing Louisiana v. Callais case.

1 of 2

Story summary

Louisiana v. Callais, before the Supreme Court, could weaken Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
The map was redrawn to create two majority-Black districts after a suit claimed the prior map violated the VRA.
Opponents say the new map discriminates against non-Black voters.
A ruling against the VRA could allow redistricting without race considerations and flip up to 19 Democratic-to-Republican seats while diminishing minority representation.

1 / 2