Story perspectives

Immigration Barrister Faces Disciplinary Action Over AI Misuse

10/17/2025

Summary

Story summary

Chowdhury Rahman, an immigration barrister, faces potential disciplinary action after Judge Mark Blundell criticized his use of AI tools, including ChatGPT, to prepare submissions.
At a tribunal hearing for two Honduran sisters seeking asylum, Blundell found Rahman cited 12 authorities, many of which were fictitious or irrelevant.
Blundell said Rahman concealed his reliance on AI, wasted the tribunal's time, and Blundell is considering reporting Rahman to the Bar Standards Board.

History

Historical Context

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), established in 2007, oversees over 125,000 solicitors in England and Wales. In 2019, it mandated technology training for solicitors to enhance ethical compliance. Chowdhury Rahman's case highlighted ongoing concerns about AI's role in legal processes, prompting discussions on stricter regulations to ensure accountability and integrity in legal practices, reflecting broader trends in legal oversight.

1 of 2

Story summary

Chowdhury Rahman, an immigration barrister, faces potential disciplinary action after Judge Mark Blundell criticized his use of AI tools, including ChatGPT, to prepare submissions.
At a tribunal hearing for two Honduran sisters seeking asylum, Blundell found Rahman cited 12 authorities, many of which were fictitious or irrelevant.
Blundell said Rahman concealed his reliance on AI, wasted the tribunal's time, and Blundell is considering reporting Rahman to the Bar Standards Board.

1 / 2