Story perspectives

Trump's Troop Deployment in Portland Upheld by Court

10/22/2025

Summary

Trump's Troops Deployed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump can deploy National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, amid protests, despite state opposition.
The 2-1 decision overturned a lower court's restraining order and cited Title 10 authority.
Dissenting Judge Susan Graber argued the ruling undermines constitutional principles and First Amendment rights.
Hearings are scheduled to assess implications for state sovereignty and civil rights.

Summary

Trump's Troops Challenged

U.S. President Donald Trump faces Supreme Court review of his plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois.
State officials and a bipartisan group of former governors oppose the move.
Their amicus brief argues the action bypasses constitutional power balance and gubernatorial consent.
Legal experts say relying on 19th-century precedent may misapply it to protests not meeting rebellion thresholds.

History

Historical Context

The Militia Act of 1903 established federal authority over state militias, allowing President Theodore Roosevelt to deploy troops during emergencies. This precedent resurfaced in 2020 when President Trump invoked Title 10 to send National Guard troops to Portland, raising concerns about state sovereignty and civil rights amid ongoing tensions between federal and state powers, reminiscent of historical conflicts during civil unrest.

1 of 3

Trump's Troops Deployed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump can deploy National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, amid protests, despite state opposition.
The 2-1 decision overturned a lower court's restraining order and cited Title 10 authority.
Dissenting Judge Susan Graber argued the ruling undermines constitutional principles and First Amendment rights.
Hearings are scheduled to assess implications for state sovereignty and civil rights.

1 / 3