Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Lizzo Faces Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Over Unreleased Song

10/23/2025, 9:13:53 PM

Overview of the Lawsuit

Lizzo, the Grammy-winning artist, is embroiled in a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by the Georgia-based GRC Trust. The lawsuit, submitted on October 21, 2025, in California, alleges that Lizzo's unreleased track, tentatively titled "I'm Goin' In Till October" (also referred to as "Good Jeans"), unlawfully samples the 1970 song "Win or Lose (We Tried)" by Sam Dees. The GRC Trust claims that Lizzo's song incorporates both instrumental and vocal elements from their copyrighted work without permission.

Background and Context

The controversy surrounding Lizzo's song intensified after she shared a 13-second snippet on social media platforms, including TikTok and Instagram, in August 2025. The snippet features the lyric, "Bitch, I got good jeans like I'm Sydney," referencing actress Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle jeans campaign, which had drawn criticism for its perceived racial undertones. The GRC Trust asserts that Lizzo and her label, Atlantic Records, profited from the exposure generated by the snippet, despite the song never being commercially released or monetized.

Legal Claims and Demands

The GRC Trust's complaint indicates that they sought an informal resolution with Lizzo's team but reached an impasse, prompting the lawsuit. They are seeking an injunction to prevent further distribution of the song, as well as damages that include all profits made by Lizzo and Atlantic, along with the trust's losses. The lawsuit highlights the legal complexities surrounding sampling in music, particularly in the age of social media, where unreleased tracks can gain significant attention.

Official Statements & Responses

In response to the lawsuit, Lizzo's representatives expressed surprise at the legal action, emphasizing that the song has never been commercially released or monetized. They stated, "To be clear, the song has never been commercially released or monetized, and no decision has been made at this time regarding any future commercial release of the song." This statement underscores Lizzo's position that the lawsuit may be an overreach, given the song's unreleased status.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics of the lawsuit argue that it represents an overextension of copyright law, particularly as the song in question has not been officially released. Some industry observers suggest that the GRC Trust's claims may reflect a growing trend of legal actions against artists for sampling, even in cases where the material has not been commercially exploited. This case raises questions about the balance between protecting intellectual property and fostering creative expression in the music industry.

What's Next?

As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future, particularly regarding unreleased music and social media exposure. The GRC Trust's claims may prompt a reevaluation of how artists approach sampling and copyright clearance in the digital age.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “We are surprised that The GRC Trust filed this lawsuit. To be clear, the song has never been commercially released or monetized, and no decision has been made at this time regarding any future commercial release of the song.” — Lizzo's Representative
  • “The song’s creators obtained profits they would not have realized but for their infringement.” — GRC Trust Complaint

This lawsuit not only highlights the ongoing challenges artists face regarding copyright issues but also reflects the evolving landscape of music production and distribution in the digital era.