Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

The "No Kings" Protests: A Response to Trump's Policies

10/26/2025, 12:44:10 AM

Overview of the Protests

On October 18, 2025, millions of demonstrators participated in the "No Kings" protests across the United States, denouncing what they perceive as authoritarianism and corruption under President Donald Trump. The protests were marked by a unique visual element: participants donned inflatable animal costumes, including frogs, unicorns, and lobsters, to counter narratives that framed them as violent extremists. The protests also extended internationally, with gatherings in cities like Paris and Kuala Lumpur.

Background & Context

The "No Kings" protests emerged in response to escalating concerns regarding Trump's policies, including his militarized immigration enforcement and the deployment of National Guard troops in urban areas. Activists aimed to challenge the portrayal of protests as "Hate America" rallies, a characterization made by some Republican leaders, including House Speaker Mike Johnson. The inflatable costumes were inspired by a viral incident in Portland, where a protester in a frog suit was sprayed with pepper spray by law enforcement, highlighting the absurdity of police responses to peaceful demonstrations.

Key Figures & Groups

Prominent figures in the protests included Seth Todd, the Portland protester who became emblematic of the inflatable costume movement. Activists like Jordy Lybeck and Brooks Brown spearheaded "Operation Inflation," which aimed to distribute inflatable suits to protesters, enhancing visibility and humor in their demonstrations. The protests also saw participation from various activist groups, including pro-Palestine organizations in Malaysia.

The Role of Humor in Protest

The use of inflatable costumes represents a strategic approach to protest, employing humor to undermine the serious narratives surrounding Trump's administration. This tactic aligns with historical precedents of using absurdity in activism, such as the Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army. Activists believe that humor can disarm authoritarian narratives and make it difficult for authorities to justify violent responses to peaceful protests.

Official Statements & Responses

President Trump dismissed the protests as a "joke," asserting that the participants do not represent the American populace. In contrast, activists argue that the inflatable costumes serve to highlight the absurdity of the administration's claims about protest violence. The White House has not issued a formal response to the protests, but the administration's actions, including recent sanctions on Russia's oil and gas industry, have been framed as part of a broader strategy to assert U.S. influence internationally.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics of the inflatable costume movement argue that while humor can be effective, it may also dilute the seriousness of the issues at stake, particularly regarding immigration and civil rights. Some activists express concern that the playful nature of the protests could lead to a perception of triviality, undermining the urgency of their demands for systemic change.

What's Next

As the protests continue, activists plan to maintain momentum by organizing further demonstrations and leveraging social media to amplify their message. The effectiveness of humor in activism will be closely observed, especially in the context of ongoing political tensions and the upcoming elections.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “One of the things fascists can't handle is humor,” — Scott Rohrbach, Protester
  • “I obviously started a movement of people showing up looking ridiculous, which is the exact point,” — Seth Todd, Protester
  • “They do it in such a way that any response from the government makes them look worse,” — Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton Professor

The "No Kings" protests illustrate a significant moment in contemporary activism, blending humor with serious political critique as Americans navigate the complexities of governance under President Trump.