Story perspectives

Bipartisan FCC Chairs Demand Repeal of "News Distortion" Policy

11/17/2025

Summary

Story summary

A bipartisan group of former FCC chairs calls on Brendan Carr, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), to repeal its "news distortion" policy, saying it is unconstitutional and abused to target Donald Trump.
They argue the policy is invoked excessively, chilling journalistic freedom.
They say the policy contradicts Supreme Court rulings protecting free speech and could invite legal challenges.
The petitioners include former FCC leaders from both parties.

History

Historical Context

The 1964 Supreme Court ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan established a high standard for public figures to prove defamation, requiring proof of "actual malice." This decision significantly strengthened First Amendment protections and has influenced media practices regarding public figures, including Donald Trump. Recent calls from former FCC chairs to repeal the "news distortion" policy highlight ongoing debates about free speech and journalistic integrity.

1 of 2

Story summary

A bipartisan group of former FCC chairs calls on Brendan Carr, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), to repeal its "news distortion" policy, saying it is unconstitutional and abused to target Donald Trump.
They argue the policy is invoked excessively, chilling journalistic freedom.
They say the policy contradicts Supreme Court rulings protecting free speech and could invite legal challenges.
The petitioners include former FCC leaders from both parties.

1 / 2