Full Breakdown
Colorado's Wolf Reintroduction Efforts Stalled by Washington's Decision
11/19/2025, 4:06:18 PM
Washington Denies Colorado's Request for Wolves
The Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission voted 8-1 against Colorado Parks and Wildlife's (CPW) request for 10 to 15 gray wolves for relocation this winter. The decision, made on November 18, 2025, was influenced by concerns over Washington's declining gray wolf population, which is classified as endangered under both state and federal law. Kelly Susewind, director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, indicated that while the request was biologically feasible, it was ultimately rejected due to insufficient public support and the wolves' endangered status.
Background on Colorado's Wolf Reintroduction
CPW has been actively working on wolf reintroduction since December 2023, having released 25 wolves from Oregon and British Columbia into Colorado's Grand, Summit, Pitkin, and Eagle counties. However, the initiative has faced significant challenges, including the deaths of 10 of the relocated wolves due to various causes, including legal and illegal shootings and conflicts with other predators. The agency's attempts to source wolves from Washington were prompted by a directive from Brian Nesvik, the newly appointed director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who informed CPW that sourcing from British Columbia was no longer an option due to permitting issues.
Challenges in Sourcing Wolves
CPW's efforts to secure wolves have been met with obstacles from multiple states. Previous attempts to obtain wolves from the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Nation were rescinded due to a lack of meaningful consultation with Colorado's Ute tribes. Additionally, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have also declined to provide wolves to Colorado. The Washington commission expressed concerns about the potential impact of translocating wolves, noting the expected mortality rate among relocated animals.
Official Statements & Responses
CPW remains committed to exploring all available options for sourcing wolves for its reintroduction program. According to Tom Delehanty, a senior attorney with Earthjustice, the federal 10(j) rule allows CPW flexibility in sourcing wolves, potentially from states like Wisconsin, Michigan, or Minnesota if other populations are unavailable.
Criticism & Opposition
During public comments at the Washington meeting, some individuals criticized factions in Colorado that oppose wolf reintroduction, highlighting a sentiment among certain members of the public who appear to support the elimination of wolves in the state. This opposition reflects broader tensions surrounding wildlife management and conservation efforts in Colorado.
What's Next for Colorado's Wolf Reintroduction?
As CPW navigates these challenges, it will continue to seek alternative sources for wolves to support its ongoing reintroduction efforts. The agency's next steps will be crucial in determining the future of gray wolves in Colorado and the overall success of the reintroduction program.
Verbatim Quotes
- “Translocation is really, really hard on animals,” — Lorna Smith, Washington Fish and Wildlife Commissioner
- “That … illustrates that there’s no mandatory source population, i.e., CPW has flexibility,” — Tom Delehanty, Senior Attorney, Earthjustice
