Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Ecological Concerns Surround Cambridge Busway Proposal

11/19/2025, 4:44:42 PM

Overview of the Proposed Busway Project

A £160 million busway project intended to connect Cambourne to Cambridge has sparked significant ecological concerns as it is set to traverse Coton Orchard, one of Cambridgeshire's last traditional orchards. This public inquiry, led by planning inspectors appointed by the transport secretary, is examining the implications of the busway until November 21, 2025. Coton Orchard, a 24-hectare site, is recognized as a priority habitat and is home to century-old Bramley trees, along with various species of rare moths, bats, birds, and butterflies.

Stakeholder Perspectives

The Greater Cambridge Partnership (GCP) and Cambridgeshire County Council advocate for the busway, arguing it is essential for accommodating housing growth, reducing congestion, and promoting sustainable travel. They assert that the project is necessary to unlock developments, including the 3,500-home Bourn airfield site, which requires the busway to proceed after the initial 500 homes are constructed. GCP claims to have thoroughly evaluated alternative routes, concluding that existing roads would not provide the same benefits.

Conversely, local residents and environmental advocates oppose the project, citing the irreversible ecological damage it would cause. Over 24,000 individuals have signed a petition against the busway, and Coton Parish Council has proposed an alternative route utilizing an on-road section of the A1303, which they believe would be more effective and less harmful. Carolyn Postgate, a parish councillor, expressed community frustration, stating, “The community does not feel they have been listened to.”

Biodiversity Concerns

Critics of the project emphasize the potential loss of biodiversity, with Anna Gazeley, a local landowner, labeling the scheme “sacrilege.” She argues that sacrificing a century-old orchard for no clear public benefit is unacceptable. GCP has committed to achieving a 20% biodiversity net gain across its infrastructure program, but experts like Dominic Woodfield, a chartered ecologist, contend that GCP's assessments misclassify significant portions of the orchard, undermining the project's biodiversity claims.

Woodfield highlighted that the habitat, which has taken decades to develop, cannot be replaced by biodiversity credits from other sites. He stated, “You cannot replace a habitat that has taken decades to form with credits from another council-owned site… species that rely on these trees will simply disappear.”

Official Statements & Responses

GCP maintains that the busway is crucial for future housing and infrastructure needs, asserting that they have explored other options but found them lacking. Environmental groups have raised alarms about the implications of the project, warning that it could set a concerning precedent for the treatment of irreplaceable habitats in future infrastructure developments.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

The inquiry has revealed discrepancies regarding the ecological assessments of Coton Orchard. While GCP claims only a small portion of the orchard qualifies as traditional habitat, experts argue that significant areas have been misclassified, which could affect biodiversity outcomes. The inquiry's findings will be submitted to transport secretary Heidi Alexander, with potential implications for national policy on habitat protection.

What's Next

As the inquiry continues, inspectors will gather evidence until November 21, 2025, after which they will provide recommendations that could influence future infrastructure projects and their environmental assessments across the UK.