Controversy Surrounds Defense Secretary Hegseth's Orders on Military Engagement

Recent reports have emerged regarding Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's alleged directive to military officials to "kill them all" in operations targeting individuals labeled as "narco-terrorists" by the Donald Trump administration. This claim has sparked significant outrage and raised questions about the legality of military actions taken under such orders. Notably, a Washington Post report detailed an incident where two survivors of an initial attack were subsequently killed in a second strike, intensifying scrutiny over the actions taken by U.S. military forces.

Raw Story

Attorney George Conway has voiced strong criticism of Hegseth's orders, asserting that they could lead to serious legal repercussions. During an appearance on MS NOW's “The Weekend,” Conway argued that the context of the attacks does not meet the criteria for lawful military engagement. He emphasized that the individuals targeted were not engaged in combat against U.S. forces, stating, “There is no war between us, Venezuela and these people were not sailors or soldiers fighting with weapons against us, so that the law of war doesn't even apply.” Conway further elaborated that even if the targets were armed, the subsequent attack on individuals in the water would still constitute a violation of international law.

Raw Story

Conway's assertions highlight a broader concern among legal experts regarding the implications of Hegseth's orders. He stated, “No matter how you look at this, you can apply civilian law, military law, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, international law, foreign law, domestic law, federal law, state law. No matter what legal regime you apply to, the second strike, it's murder. Period.” This perspective underscores the potential for Hegseth to face criminal charges that may extend beyond the protections typically afforded to military officials under the law.

Raw Story

As of now, there has been no official response from the Department of Defense regarding the allegations against Hegseth. The lack of a statement has left many questions unanswered about the legality and ethical considerations of the military's actions in this context. The situation continues to develop, with legal experts and commentators closely monitoring the implications of Hegseth's orders.

Raw Story

While the Washington Post report has been a focal point for criticism, there are varying accounts regarding the specifics of the military engagement and the context in which Hegseth's orders were given. This discrepancy highlights the need for further investigation into the events surrounding the attacks and the legal frameworks governing military operations.

Raw Story

• “There is no war between us, Venezuela and these people were not sailors or soldiers fighting with weapons against us, so that the law of war doesn't even [apply],” — George Conway, Attorney

Raw Story

• “No matter how you look at this, you can apply civilian law, military law, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, international law, foreign law, domestic law, federal law, state law. No matter what legal regime you apply to, the second strike, it's murder. Period,” — George Conway, Attorney

Raw Story