Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Jury Awards Megan Thee Stallion $59K in Defamation Case

12/3/2025

39 8 Full Breakdown

Summary

Megan Thee Stallion Wins

A Miami jury found blogger Milagro Cooper liable for defamation and emotional distress, awarding Megan Thee Stallion $59,000.
The case centered on Cooper promoting an AI-generated deepfake video that harmed Megan Thee Stallion's reputation.
Cooper denied knowing the video was fake.
Her attorney warned of free-speech implications and a chilling effect.
The verdict underlines debates over online speech and digital creators' responsibilities.

Summary

Megan Defeats Defamation

Megan Thee Stallion testified and won a defamation case against blogger Milagro Gramz in Miami, with Gramz found liable for defamation and emotional distress.
The jury awarded Megan $75,000, later reduced to $59,000, with Gramz required to cover Megan's legal fees expected to exceed $1 million.
Gramz was designated a "media defendant," a status that could lead to the dismissal of the defamation charge.

History

Historical Context

The 1964 Supreme Court case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan established the "actual malice" standard for defamation, requiring public figures to prove that false statements were made knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth. This precedent is echoed in the recent Miami verdict against Milagro Cooper, highlighting ongoing tensions between free speech and accountability for digital content creators in today's legal landscape.

1 of 3

Megan Thee Stallion Wins

A Miami jury found blogger Milagro Cooper liable for defamation and emotional distress, awarding Megan Thee Stallion $59,000.
The case centered on Cooper promoting an AI-generated deepfake video that harmed Megan Thee Stallion's reputation.
Cooper denied knowing the video was fake.
Her attorney warned of free-speech implications and a chilling effect.
The verdict underlines debates over online speech and digital creators' responsibilities.

1 / 3