Full Breakdown
SeaWorld Orlando Faces Lawsuit Over Bird Strike Incident
12/4/2025, 9:48:02 AM
Overview of the Incident
SeaWorld Orlando is currently embroiled in a legal dispute following a lawsuit filed by Hillary Martin, an Orange County woman who claims she was struck in the face by a duck while riding the Mako roller coaster on March 24, 2025. Martin alleges that the incident resulted in permanent injuries, including both mental and physical pain, and she is seeking at least $50,000 in damages. The lawsuit, filed on October 27, contends that SeaWorld failed to maintain a safe environment, creating a "zone of risk" due to the coaster's proximity to a body of water where waterfowl congregate.
SeaWorld's Response
In response to the lawsuit, SeaWorld has filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that Martin was not hit by a duck but rather by a snowy egret, a type of migratory bird. The park's legal team argues that it cannot be held liable for the actions of wild animals. SeaWorld also noted that Martin declined immediate medical transport after the incident, opting instead to continue her visit to the park. According to SeaWorld, she did not seek medical attention until the following day, which they argue undermines her claims of severe injury.
Legal Arguments
SeaWorld's motion to dismiss emphasizes that the incident could have occurred regardless of the park's layout or the presence of water. The company contends that the nature of the roller coaster ride does not inherently increase the risk of bird strikes. Their legal filing states, “Martin’s event, by its own description, could have occurred regardless of the presence of any body of water within the park, and it still would not have been SeaWorld’s legal responsibility.”
Criticism of SeaWorld's Position
Martin's legal team counters that the high speed of the Mako coaster makes a collision with a flying bird a significant risk. They argue that the design of the ride may disorient birds, increasing the likelihood of such incidents. The lawsuit claims that SeaWorld either knew or should have known about this potential danger and failed to take appropriate measures to mitigate it.
Official Statements
In a public statement regarding the ongoing litigation, SeaWorld emphasized its commitment to guest safety, stating, “The safety of our guests and employees is a top priority, and we take these situations seriously. We will not be commenting beyond that as this is pending litigation.”
Upcoming Developments
A hearing for SeaWorld's motion to dismiss is scheduled for December 8, 2025, in Orange County court. The outcome of this hearing will determine the next steps in the case, which has garnered public interest due to its unusual nature. Meanwhile, the Mako roller coaster continues to operate as normal.
Verbatim Quotes
- “This matter does not and has never involved a duck,” — SeaWorld's legal team
- “The safety of our guests and employees is a top priority, and we take these situations seriously. We will not be commenting beyond that as this is pending litigation.” — SeaWorld spokesperson
This case highlights the complexities of liability in incidents involving wildlife at amusement parks and raises questions about the responsibilities of operators in ensuring guest safety.
