Story perspectives

DOJ Scraps Disparate Impact Rules, Refocuses on Intent

12/11/2025

Summary

Story summary

The Department of Justice eliminated disparate impact liability from Title VI regulations, narrowing enforcement to intentional discrimination.
Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated that the previous regulations undermined equal treatment under the law.
U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order mandating repeal of disparate impact regulations, which allowed lawsuits without proof of intent.
The DOJ aims to reduce regulatory burdens and promote consistent enforcement across federal agencies.

History

Historical Context

In 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice revised Title VI regulations, removing disparate impact liability, which previously allowed lawsuits without proving intent. This change echoes the 1989 Supreme Court case *City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.*, which restricted affirmative action. The implications raise concerns about diminished protections for marginalized groups, potentially undermining equitable treatment under federal law.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Department of Justice eliminated disparate impact liability from Title VI regulations, narrowing enforcement to intentional discrimination.
Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated that the previous regulations undermined equal treatment under the law.
U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order mandating repeal of disparate impact regulations, which allowed lawsuits without proof of intent.
The DOJ aims to reduce regulatory burdens and promote consistent enforcement across federal agencies.

1 / 2