Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

European Withdrawal from Landmine Ban Treaty Raises Concerns in Southeast Asia

12/11/2025, 10:14:49 PM

Core Event: European Nations Withdraw from the Ottawa Convention

Several European nations, including Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Finland, have announced plans to withdraw from the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty, also known as the Ottawa Convention. This decision, influenced by security concerns stemming from Russia's actions, has raised alarm among governments and victims in Southeast Asia, a region still heavily affected by landmines. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also issued a decree to exit the treaty due to the ongoing conflict with Russia. The withdrawals are expected to be finalized by the end of the year.

Background & Context: The Ottawa Convention and Its Importance

The Ottawa Convention, which came into force in 1999, prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of anti-personnel mines. It also commits member states to clear contaminated land and assist victims. With 166 countries having ratified the treaty, its withdrawal by any member is unprecedented and threatens to undermine the global consensus against landmines. The European Union has historically been a significant donor to mine action, contributing approximately €110 million (around $130 million) to clearance operations last year.

Impact on Southeast Asia: Concerns Over Demining Efforts

Southeast Asia remains one of the most mine-affected regions globally, a legacy of Cold War conflicts and ongoing civil wars. Cambodia, once among the most heavily mined countries, has made progress towards being declared mine-free. However, the recent European withdrawals could weaken the political consensus supporting mine action and diminish the moral authority of donors urging Southeast Asian nations to cease anti-personnel mine usage. Analysts warn that the European exit sends a troubling message about the negotiability of humanitarian norms.

Criticism & Opposition: Voices Against the Withdrawals

Critics, including UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and a group of 101 Nobel laureates, have expressed grave concerns over the implications of these withdrawals. Taslidzan, an expert on international relations, emphasized that the actions of withdrawing states mislead their citizens about the security provided by landmines and undermine humanitarian efforts that have saved countless lives. Joshua Kurlantzick from the Council on Foreign Relations noted that the wave of withdrawals could significantly diminish the treaty's effectiveness in Asia, especially as landmines are actively used in conflicts in Myanmar and along the Thai-Cambodian border.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps: Funding Implications and Regional Reactions

While it remains uncertain whether the European withdrawals will directly impact funding for demining in Southeast Asia, experts suggest that none of the withdrawing countries were major funders of regional demining operations. However, the perception that European nations can abandon the treaty may embolden Southeast Asian countries to reconsider their commitments to mine action. The ongoing border crisis between Thailand and Cambodia, which has resulted in casualties and displacement, highlights the potential for renewed tensions and the misuse of landmines.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “When European states walk away from the Ottawa Convention, they are sending the wrong message to the entire world: that the global consensus against landmines is weakening, that humanitarian norms are negotiable, and that political pressures justify abandoning obligations that have saved tens of thousands of lives,” — Taslidzan, Expert on International Relations
  • “However, European countries ditching the Ottawa Convention "will be a shameful example that I fear many Southeast Asian countries will use as an argument to say that it's not so bad if they restock these weapons," he said.” — Phil Robertson, Director of Asia Human Rights and Labor Advocates

The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for both regional security and humanitarian efforts in Southeast Asia as the international community watches the developments closely.