Story perspectives

Minneapolis Council Strengthens Protections Against ICE Arrests

12/12/2025

Summary

Council Enhances Protections

Minneapolis City Council will hold a public hearing on changes to the city's separation ordinance to enhance protections against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) involvement.
A Bay Area class-action lawsuit challenges ICE's practice of arresting immigrants at courthouses, arguing the arrests deter lawful court attendance.
Nationally, federal judges are increasingly rejecting the Trump administration's detention policies, citing due process violations, prolonged detentions, and inadequate medical care.

Summary

Council Addresses Authority

Minneapolis city council members address concerns about local police authority in immigration arrests.
Recent incidents show Troy police making arrests in Keene, raising jurisdiction questions.
Legal experts say Troy officers lack authority to arrest outside their municipality.
An agent from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Cincinnati, Samuel Saxon, faces charges of domestic violence and assault.
Prosecutors seek to keep Saxon in custody without bond as the case progresses.

History

Historical Context

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 3, marked a pivotal shift in U.S. immigration policy by abolishing national origin quotas that had favored Northern and Western Europeans since the 1920s. This act increased immigration from diverse regions, significantly altering the demographic landscape and contributing to ongoing debates about immigration enforcement and community safety, particularly in cities like Minneapolis.

1 of 3

Council Enhances Protections

Minneapolis City Council will hold a public hearing on changes to the city's separation ordinance to enhance protections against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) involvement.
A Bay Area class-action lawsuit challenges ICE's practice of arresting immigrants at courthouses, arguing the arrests deter lawful court attendance.
Nationally, federal judges are increasingly rejecting the Trump administration's detention policies, citing due process violations, prolonged detentions, and inadequate medical care.

1 / 3