Full Breakdown
Resignation of Joe Berman Highlights Tensions Within the ADL
12/13/2025, 7:49:40 AM
Background on the ADL's Mission Shift
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), founded to combat antisemitism and promote civil rights, has faced internal dissent regarding its evolving focus under CEO Jonathan Greenblatt. Since the onset of the second Trump administration, the organization has narrowed its mission primarily to fighting antisemitism, leading to significant changes in its operations and alliances.
Joe Berman's Resignation
Joe Berman, who chaired the ADL’s National Legal Affairs Committee from 2018 to 2022, publicly resigned in March 2025, citing the organization's failure to adequately address antisemitism on the right. In his resignation letter, Berman described the ADL as a “useful idiot” for the Trump administration, arguing that it has provided cover for individuals and policies that threaten democratic values. He expressed concern that the ADL's current trajectory could have dire consequences for Jewish Americans.
Criticism of the ADL's Direction
Berman's resignation reflects a broader discontent among former ADL leaders and supporters regarding the organization's shift away from its traditional civil rights advocacy. Critics, including Berman, have noted the closure of the "World of Difference" anti-bigotry training program and the diminishing emphasis on coalition-building with other civil rights groups. Berman lamented that the ADL has abandoned its historical alliances with LGBTQ, African American, and immigrant communities, which he believes undermines its credibility and effectiveness.
Voices of Dissent
Stacy Burdett, a former vice president at the ADL, emphasized that the dual mission of protecting Jewish rights and advocating for all civil rights has been a strategic imperative since Lincoln’s administration. She argued that separating these missions harms both objectives. Other former staff members echoed similar sentiments, expressing concern that the ADL's current focus alienates potential allies in the fight against discrimination.
Official Responses from the ADL
In response to Berman's resignation and criticisms, an ADL spokesperson reiterated the organization's commitment to addressing the rising tide of antisemitism. The spokesperson stated that the ADL is prioritizing resources to protect the Jewish community during a time of increased antisemitic violence. They characterized this focus as an "oxygen mask moment," emphasizing the need to allocate limited resources effectively.
Conflicting Reports on the ADL's Strategy
While the ADL maintains that its educational initiatives continue to address antisemitism, critics argue that the organization has neglected a holistic approach to combating bigotry. The disbanding of the ADL’s Civil Rights Law team and the shift in litigation focus to antisemitism have raised alarms among former contributors who believe that the organization is losing its unique position in civil rights advocacy.
Conclusion: The Future of the ADL
Berman's resignation underscores a pivotal moment for the ADL as it navigates its identity and mission in a politically charged environment. He expressed regret over leaving an organization that had been integral to his life, emphasizing the importance of the dual mission of protecting Jews while advancing civil rights for all. The ongoing debate within the ADL may shape its future direction and impact its standing in both the Jewish community and the broader civil rights landscape.
