Story perspectives

USDA Approves SNAP Junk Food Restrictions in Six States

12/14/2025

Center

USDA Implements SNAP Restrictions

The U.S. Department of Agriculture approved waivers for six states to restrict Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) junk-food purchases starting in 2026.
Six states are Hawaii, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee.
The restrictions target soda, candy, and energy drinks, aligned with U.S. President Donald Trump’s Make America Healthy Again initiative.
Critics say the measures limit choices for low-income families and worsen food access in food deserts.

Left

Trump Supports SNAP Restrictions

During the recent government shutdown, millions faced delays or loss of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
Funding has been restored, despite $187 billion cuts over next decade that would raise poverty and hunger for around 4 million.
New work requirements and stricter eligibility criteria will strain families.
North Dakota plans to restrict SNAP purchases of unhealthy foods, backed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

History

Historical Context

In 2018, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reformed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which serves around 40 million Americans. The Trump administration proposed $187 billion in cuts over ten years, affecting approximately 4 million individuals. These changes, including state waivers to restrict food purchases, may worsen food access for low-income families, particularly in food deserts, reflecting ongoing tensions in U.S. food assistance policy.

1 of 3

USDA Implements SNAP Restrictions

The U.S. Department of Agriculture approved waivers for six states to restrict Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) junk-food purchases starting in 2026.
Six states are Hawaii, Missouri, North Dakota, South Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee.
The restrictions target soda, candy, and energy drinks, aligned with U.S. President Donald Trump’s Make America Healthy Again initiative.
Critics say the measures limit choices for low-income families and worsen food access in food deserts.

1 / 3