Full Breakdown
Defamation Case: Julian Batchelor vs. TVNZ and the Role of Jim Grenon
12/17/2025, 11:19:16 AM
Overview of the Defamation Case
Julian Batchelor, a controversial figure known for his anti-co-governance stance, is suing Television New Zealand (TVNZ) and Dr. Sanjana Hattotuwa, a former researcher for The Disinformation Project, for defamation. The case stems from an August 2023 news story that described Batchelor's pamphlet as containing "racist rhetoric" and making "unfounded claims" about Maori elites. Batchelor is seeking $50,000 in damages and an apology on the 6 PM news bulletin.
Financial Backing from Jim Grenon
Central to the case is the financial support provided by Jim Grenon, a Canadian billionaire and director of New Zealand Media and Entertainment (NZME). Grenon, who owns an 18.5% stake in NZME, became involved after viewing the TVNZ report. He contacted Batchelor, expressing his belief that Batchelor was not a racist and suggesting they pursue legal action against TVNZ. Batchelor confirmed in court that Grenon is directly funding his legal fees and has been instrumental in the lawsuit's initiation.
Court Proceedings and Testimonies
During the court hearings, various testimonies were presented. Batchelor claimed that Hattotuwa's comments were not adequately communicated to him during a phone call with TVNZ reporter Te Aniwa Hurihanganui. He stated, “I am saying she’s lying,” regarding the assertion that Hattotuwa's claims were put to him. However, Hurihanganui defended her reporting, asserting that she summarized Batchelor's responses accurately, despite not retaining a full record of their conversation.
The court also heard from Peter Williams, a former TVNZ presenter, who described his regret over being involved in the case and referred to Batchelor as a "nutter." Williams indicated that Grenon had contacted him to participate as a witness. This revelation prompted Judge David Clark to comment on the nature of conversations during trials.
Criticism of the Reporting
Batchelor has characterized the TVNZ article as a "hit piece" lacking balance. He expressed feelings of shock and hurt over the coverage, which he viewed as a significant injustice. In contrast, TVNZ's defense maintains that the article accurately reflected Batchelor's position and included his denials of the allegations made by Hattotuwa.
Broader Implications
The case raises questions about media responsibility and the impact of financial backing on legal actions in defamation cases. Batchelor's claims of personal and professional harm, including negative public perception, highlight the potential consequences of media narratives on individuals' reputations.
Verbatim Quotes
- “He [Williams] told me that he regretted being involved. He described Mr Batchelor as a nutter and he said Jim Grenon was paying for the whole thing.” — O’Sullivan, Court Witness
- “Of his own feelings, Batchelor said: “I was shocked by that news piece from TVNZ and very hurt by it.” — Julian Batchelor, Plaintiff
- “I thought he was rambling a bit.” — Te Aniwa Hurihanganui, TVNZ Reporter
What's Next
The court proceedings are ongoing, with closing addresses expected soon. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for media practices and the dynamics of defamation lawsuits in New Zealand.
