FEMA Grant Backlog Under Kristi Noem's Review Policy

More than $900 million in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grants and loans are currently awaiting approval from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem due to her policy requiring personal review of all major expenditures exceeding $100,000. This backlog has raised concerns about the impact on disaster recovery efforts across the United States, as FEMA plays a crucial role in funding disaster preparedness and recovery initiatives.

The HillTruthOut

Noem's policy has been criticized for slowing down the approval process for essential funding. Michael Coen, a former FEMA chief of staff, noted that the delays could adversely affect recovery efforts in various states, particularly following recent disasters such as the Texas floods. Critics argue that while the policy aims to enhance accountability and prevent misuse of taxpayer dollars, it has resulted in significant delays, with some mission assignments reportedly taking up to 72 hours longer than before.

The Hill

Josh Morton, president of the International Association of Emergency Managers, acknowledged that while the review process may be contributing to delays, other factors, such as ongoing litigation surrounding certain grant programs, also play a role. He highlighted the case of Saluda County, South Carolina, which has been waiting months for reimbursement for Hurricane Helene-related expenses, indicating that the backlog is affecting local governments and their ability to respond to emergencies.

The Hill

A FEMA spokesperson defended Noem's review policy, stating that it has saved taxpayers $10.7 billion and ensures that recovery funds are used effectively. The spokesperson emphasized that Noem has reviewed over 5,000 contracts since taking office and that the review process is designed to maintain public trust while supporting communities in their recovery efforts.

The HillTruthOut

In contrast, Pete Gaynor, a former FEMA administrator, criticized the practicality of the review policy, questioning how effective it is to micromanage expenditures at such a granular level. He argued that previous administrations managed to prevent financial mismanagement through audits without imposing such stringent review processes.

The Hill

The review policy has faced backlash not only from former FEMA officials but also from disaster survivors. Survivors from various states, including Texas, have expressed frustration over the delays in receiving assistance, which they attribute to Noem's management style. Brandy Gerstner, a survivor of recent floods, described feeling abandoned by FEMA as her community struggled to recover, with many still homeless months after the disaster.

TruthOut

Additionally, a group of current and former FEMA employees has voiced concerns that Noem's policies are undermining the agency's ability to respond effectively to disasters, calling for accountability and a reevaluation of the current approach.

The Hill

While FEMA officials report that over 3,860 applications for disaster assistance have been approved in central Texas, the backlog of $900 million in grants raises questions about the agency's overall efficiency. Some local officials, such as Kerrville spokesperson Crystal Stutes, have stated that they have not encountered issues with FEMA, contrasting with the experiences reported by others.

The Hill

The Trump administration's plans for FEMA reform remain uncertain, with discussions about potentially cutting the agency's staffing and altering its funding mechanisms. As the backlog continues to grow, the implications for disaster recovery and the effectiveness of FEMA under Noem's leadership will likely remain a focal point of scrutiny and debate.

The Hill