Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Proposed Medicaid Changes Raise Concerns for Vermont ABA Providers

12/20/2025, 7:37:09 AM

Overview of Proposed Changes

The Department of Vermont Health Access has announced proposed changes to Medicaid billing rules that could significantly impact Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) providers in the state. Set to take effect on January 1, 2026, these changes include a controversial policy that would prevent concurrent billing for services provided by different specialists. This has raised alarms among providers and parents of children with autism, who fear that the changes may threaten the viability of essential services.

Impact on ABA Services

ABA centers, such as Bounce in Essex Junction, provide critical support for children with autism, pairing them with behavior technicians who implement individualized treatment plans designed by board certified behavior analysts (BCBAs). Currently, both roles can bill separately for their services, which is crucial for the financial sustainability of these clinics. Elaina Hanson, clinical director at Bounce, expressed concern that the inability to bill for BCBA services would lead to a 20% loss in revenue, jeopardizing the center's operations and the care of its patients.

Rationale Behind the Changes

The Department of Vermont Health Access argues that the proposed changes aim to eliminate redundant billing practices and ensure that Medicaid funds are used efficiently. Alex McCracken, the department's communication director, stated that the current billing structure inherently includes supervision by the BCBA and that the changes are intended to streamline reimbursement processes without altering service availability for Medicaid beneficiaries.

Community Response and Concerns

The proposed changes have sparked significant backlash from the ABA community. Cortney and Chris Keene, BCBAs running a clinic in White River Junction, highlighted the ethical dilemma they face in potentially reducing their Medicaid patient load due to financial constraints. They, along with other providers, have initiated petitions and outreach efforts to raise awareness about the implications of the changes before the public comment period closes on December 25.

Criticism of the Approach

Critics argue that the proposed changes could dismantle the support structure for vulnerable children who rely on ABA services. Chris Keene likened the approach to "bulldozing the house" rather than addressing specific issues of waste and fraud. He emphasized that qualified professionals are essential for effective implementation of treatment plans, warning that without proper oversight, the quality of care could suffer.

Official Statements and Responses

While the Department of Vermont Health Access maintains that the changes will not affect service availability, providers remain skeptical. Hanson stated, “We can’t function this way,” emphasizing the necessity of both roles in delivering effective care. The department has expressed its commitment to supporting providers through the transition, asserting that the changes are a proactive measure to comply with federal regulations.

Conclusion

As the public comment period approaches its end, the future of ABA services in Vermont hangs in the balance. Providers and parents are advocating for reconsideration of the proposed Medicaid changes, emphasizing the critical need for continued support for children with autism. The outcome of this situation will have lasting implications for the accessibility and quality of care for some of the state's most vulnerable populations.