Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Knesset Extends Controversial Laws Amid Criticism and Protests

12/25/2025, 9:55:10 PM

Extension of Cyber Surveillance Powers

On December 27, 2023, the Israeli Knesset voted unanimously to extend a controversial law that authorizes the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Shin Bet to covertly access civilian security camera systems. This extension follows a temporary measure enacted after Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, and allows for hacking into security camera back-end technology without a judicial warrant. Critics, including legal experts and human rights advocates, argue that this law undermines privacy rights and due process. Adv. Haim Ravia, a privacy and cyber-law expert, described the legislation as a "severe infringement" on citizens' privacy, emphasizing that it permits the military to operate within civilian spaces without proper oversight.

Legal and Ethical Concerns

The law's critics highlight several key issues: it expands military authority to access civilian technology, bypasses judicial oversight, and lacks provisions for notifying individuals whose systems are hacked. Adv. Amit Ashkenazi, a former legal advisor to the Israel National Cyber Directorate, expressed concerns about the paternalistic approach of the legislation, arguing that it fails to protect citizens' rights while addressing security threats. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel echoed these sentiments, stating that the law's broad and vague grounds for intrusion raise serious concerns about potential misuse of information.

Restrictions on Foreign Media

In a separate legislative move, the Knesset also extended a law that allows the government to restrict foreign media channels deemed harmful to state security until December 31, 2027. This law grants the Minister of Communications, with the prime minister's approval, the authority to suspend broadcasts, close offices, and confiscate equipment from foreign media outlets. Critics, including human rights organizations, warn that this law could be used to suppress dissenting voices, particularly those of Arab and foreign media. The law's extension comes despite previous criticisms regarding its impact on media freedom, which has reportedly deteriorated since the onset of the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Political Inquiry into October 7 Failures

Additionally, the Knesset passed a preliminary reading of a bill to establish a politically appointed probe into the failures surrounding the October 7 attack, rather than a state commission of inquiry. This bill, supported by Likud MK Ariel Kallner, has faced significant opposition, with many arguing that it is designed to evade accountability. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for avoiding responsibility, asserting that the proposed inquiry lacks credibility and is a "shameful farce." The bill's structure allows the coalition to maintain control over the inquiry, raising further concerns about transparency and impartiality.

Criticism and Public Response

The recent legislative actions have sparked widespread criticism from various sectors, including legal experts, human rights advocates, and opposition lawmakers. Many view these measures as attempts to consolidate power and limit civil liberties in the name of security. As the Knesset continues to navigate these contentious issues, the implications for privacy rights, media freedom, and governmental accountability remain a focal point of public discourse.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “This is very troubling legislation that, for the first time, grants the IDF authority to operate within civilian property and civilian space,” — Adv. Haim Ravia, Privacy and Cyber-Law Expert
  • “This isn’t dependent on a judicial warrant.” — Adv. Amit Ashkenazi, Former Legal Advisor to the Israel National Cyber Directorate
  • “A political inquiry committee is a desecration of the memory of the fallen and a spit in the face of the bereaved families,” — Yair Golan, Chairman of The Democrats