Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Feud Between Shas and Degel HaTorah Over Jerusalem Religious Council Control

12/31/2025, 12:25:59 AM

Background of the Conflict

A significant dispute has emerged between the ultra-Orthodox Shas and Degel HaTorah parties regarding control of Jerusalem's religious council. This conflict intensified following the resignation of Nathan Nathanson, the former head of the Religious Council, which has led both factions to vie for the influential position. The chairman of the council oversees numerous religious services, including kashrut supervision and budget allocations.

Core Event: Accusations and Political Maneuvering

The feud became public during a Shas faction meeting in the Knesset, where MK Michael Malkieli accused Degel HaTorah chairman Moshe Gafni of collaborating with opposition members to block a NIS 30 million ($9.4 million) budget for the renovation of ritual baths. Malkieli's remarks suggested that Gafni's actions were motivated by a desire for control over the council's leadership rather than genuine concern for religious services. In response, Gafni's associates labeled Malkieli's accusations as "cheap smears" and asserted that Gafni acts according to the guidance of prominent religious leaders.

Diverging Interests and Political Strategies

Shas has historically prioritized control over local rabbinates as a means to consolidate political power, while Degel HaTorah seeks autonomy for the Ashkenazi Haredi community in Jerusalem. Ariel Finkelstein, a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute, noted that Shas's previous control of the Religious Services Ministry allowed it to manage internal matters effectively. However, with the ministry now held by the Likud party, Gafni argues for a share of the decision-making power.

Criticism of Political Patronage

Seth Farber, director of the ITIM nonprofit, criticized the ongoing struggle for control, stating that the politicization of religious institutions leads to inefficiency and a lack of public trust. He emphasized that the conflict has resulted in political paralysis and a coalition crisis, impacting the broader governance of the country.

Official Statements & Responses

In a statement, Gafni's spokesperson condemned Shas for its management of religious affairs, claiming that the damage caused by Shas has been evident in various religious services. The spokesperson also asserted that the public's support for Degel HaTorah marks a shift in the political landscape, urging Shas to recognize this new reality.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “The cheap smear attempts have become a tool when arguments run out,” — Close associates of Moshe Gafni
  • “When struggles for control replace public administration, the entire country pays the price,” he said.” — Seth Farber, Director of ITIM

What's Next: Implications for Governance

The ongoing conflict between Shas and Degel HaTorah is likely to continue influencing the governance of religious services in Jerusalem and beyond. As both factions assert their claims, the political landscape may further evolve, potentially leading to additional crises within the coalition government.