Full Breakdown
Controversy Surrounds Claims of Christmas Bonuses in Congress
1/3/2026, 4:10:54 AM
Allegations of Misrepresentation
On August 26, 2025, Batangas 1st District Representative Leandro Legarda Leviste filed a case against Abelardo Calalo, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Batangas 1st District Engineer, accusing him of Direct Bribery and other related offenses. This legal action stems from allegations that Calalo attempted to bribe Leviste with over P3 million to obstruct an investigation into flood control projects in Batangas. Amid this backdrop, Leviste made headlines by claiming that several members of Congress received a P2 million “Christmas bonus,” igniting a debate about the integrity of congressional funding.
Denial from Colleagues
Lanao del Sur Representative Ziaur-Rahman ‘Zia’ Adiong publicly refuted Leviste's claims, labeling them as “unfair and disingenuous.” During a media briefing, Adiong clarified that the funds Leviste referred to were not bonuses but rather Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) intended for the operational costs of congressional district offices. He emphasized that the checks presented by Leviste were issued under his name, indicating they were properly recorded and audited.
Adiong criticized Leviste for allegedly misrepresenting routine operational expenses as bonuses, suggesting that such actions could tarnish the reputation of the entire House of Representatives. He stated, “To impress upon the public that we are rotten? That the House is rotten and he’s the only one projecting himself as someone who’s scotch-free?” Adiong further noted that not all members of Congress share Leviste's financial standing, implying that many rely on the MOOE for their operational needs.
Leviste's Position
Leviste has maintained that he has declined the P20 million per year in MOOE included in congressional salaries since the beginning of his term, positioning himself as a lawmaker who does not require such financial support. His assertions about the Christmas bonuses have sparked significant discussion regarding the ethical implications of congressional funding and transparency.
Criticism & Opposition
Adiong's remarks highlight a growing concern among some lawmakers regarding the potential fallout from Leviste's claims. He argued that the misrepresentation of funds could lead to a negative public perception of Congress as a whole. Adiong's comments reflect a broader sentiment among some members who feel that Leviste's actions may unfairly paint their financial practices in a negative light.
What's Next
As the situation unfolds, the implications of Leviste's allegations and the subsequent responses from his colleagues may lead to further scrutiny of congressional funding practices. The ongoing legal case against Calalo also remains a critical aspect of this narrative, potentially influencing public opinion on issues of corruption and accountability within the government.
