Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Backlash Against DHS for Unauthorized Use of Artwork in Deportation Campaign

1/3/2026, 10:51:42 AM

Controversial Social Media Post by DHS

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has faced significant criticism for using artwork by Hiroshi Nagai, a 78-year-old Japanese artist, without permission in a social media post promoting its deportation agenda. The post, shared on New Year’s Eve, featured an image of a vintage car on a beach, overlaid with the text “America after 100 million deportations” and a caption stating, “The peace of a nation no longer besieged by the third world.” Nagai expressed his discontent on X, questioning what actions he could take regarding the unauthorized use of his work.

History of Unauthorized Use of Artists' Works

This incident is not isolated; DHS has previously been accused of using various artists' works without consent to promote its immigration policies. In July 2025, the agency shared a painting by Thomas Kinkade, which led to a condemnation from the Kinkade Family Foundation, stating that the use of the artwork was unauthorized and contrary to their mission. Similarly, artist Morgan Weistling criticized DHS for using his painting without permission, while pop stars like Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter have also condemned the agency for using their music in videos promoting deportation efforts.

DHS's Response to Criticism

In response to the backlash, a DHS spokesperson stated that the agency would continue to utilize all available tools to inform the public about its operations, emphasizing its commitment to maintaining safety. The spokesperson suggested that artists should appreciate the service of federal law enforcement rather than criticize their actions. This stance has drawn further ire from critics who argue that the agency's messaging often invokes white nationalist rhetoric and promotes division.

Broader Implications of DHS Messaging

The controversial post and the agency's ongoing use of artists' works reflect a broader strategy by the Trump administration to appeal to specific demographics, particularly young men, through provocative imagery and messaging. Critics argue that this approach not only misappropriates artistic works but also perpetuates harmful stereotypes and xenophobic sentiments. The phrase “third world” used in the DHS post has been interpreted as racially charged, further fueling accusations of promoting a white supremacist agenda.

Conflicting Reports and Public Reactions

Public reactions to the DHS's messaging have been polarized. While some support the agency's efforts to enforce immigration laws, many others view the use of artists' works and the language employed in official communications as deeply troubling. Observers have noted that the agency's posts often evoke historical themes of American exceptionalism and manifest destiny, raising concerns about the implications for racial minorities in the U.S.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “This image is being used without permission from the US department of homeland security. What should I do about this?” — Hiroshi Nagai, Artist
  • “The use of his artwork was unauthorized, and we have requested that DHS remove the post.” — Kinkade Family Foundation
  • “Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.” — Sabrina Carpenter, Singer

The ongoing controversy surrounding DHS's use of artistic works highlights the tensions between government messaging and artistic integrity, as well as the broader societal implications of immigration policy in the United States.