Story perspectives

Lawmakers Critique Military Actions in Venezuela, Warn of Risks

1/5/2026

Summary

Story summary

On January 4, 2026, Rep. James A. Himes (D-Conn.) and Sen. Christopher J. Van Hollen (D-Md.) discussed U.S. military actions in Venezuela on Face the Nation.
Himes criticized the Trump administration for insufficient communication with Democrats.
Himes warned that intervention without a clear plan is dangerous.
Van Hollen accused the administration of prioritizing oil interests over national security, and called the actions illegal.

History

Historical Context

In January 2019, the Venezuelan National Assembly declared Juan Guaidó interim president, challenging Nicolás Maduro's controversial re-election. The U.S. supported Guaidó, citing Venezuela's vast oil reserves, while Maduro's regime, backed by Russia and China, labeled the situation a U.S.-led coup. Ongoing discussions among U.S. lawmakers reflect concerns over military interventions, echoing historical critiques of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America.

1 of 2

Story summary

On January 4, 2026, Rep. James A. Himes (D-Conn.) and Sen. Christopher J. Van Hollen (D-Md.) discussed U.S. military actions in Venezuela on Face the Nation.
Himes criticized the Trump administration for insufficient communication with Democrats.
Himes warned that intervention without a clear plan is dangerous.
Van Hollen accused the administration of prioritizing oil interests over national security, and called the actions illegal.

1 / 2