Richard Pollak: A Legacy in Journalism

Richard Pollak, the founding editor of *More* magazine, passed away on December 27, 2026, in Stockholm at the age of 91. His wife, Diane Walsh, confirmed that he had been in hospice care after relocating to Sweden from Portland, Maine, in May to be closer to family. Pollak played a pivotal role in establishing *More*, a monthly journalism review that emerged in the early 1970s, critiquing the media's coverage of significant issues such as the Vietnam War, the Nixon administration, and the oil industry.

New York Times

*More* was conceived by J. Anthony Lukas, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who recognized Pollak's potential when they both worked at *The Baltimore Sun*. Lukas, who later joined *The New York Times Magazine*, encouraged Pollak to lead the new publication, stating, “What this town needs is a good journalism review, and you’re just the man to edit it.” The magazine debuted in 1971, backed by funding from William Woodward III, a journalist and banking heir. Its title, stylized as [More], symbolized the ongoing quest for deeper insights in journalism, reflecting a time when the media landscape was dominated by traditional newspapers and television networks.

New York Times

The founders of *More* aimed to challenge the status quo of the American press, which they viewed as stagnant and conservative. Kevin Lerner, writing in *Columbia Journalism Review* in 2018, noted that the publication emerged during a period of social upheaval, as public trust in institutions waned. Pollak's leadership at *More* allowed for critical examinations of contemporary issues, fostering a platform for journalistic integrity and accountability.

New York Times

Following Pollak's passing, tributes from the journalism community highlighted his influence on media critique and the importance of independent journalism. His work at *More* is remembered as a significant contribution to the discourse surrounding media ethics and responsibility during a tumultuous era in American history.

New York Times

While *More* was celebrated for its bold critiques, some critics argued that its irreverent approach could alienate traditional audiences. Detractors contended that the magazine's focus on contentious subjects sometimes overshadowed more nuanced discussions, leading to polarized views on its editorial stance.

New York Times

• “What this town needs is a good journalism review, and you’re just the man to edit it,” — J. Anthony Lukas, Journalist

New York Times

• “The founders of (More) saw the mainstream American press as stagnant, conservative and unwilling to examine themselves at a time when the country was convulsing with social movements and the public was losing confidence in institutions,” — Kevin Lerner, *Columbia Journalism Review*

New York Times

Richard Pollak's legacy as a pioneering editor and advocate for journalistic integrity continues to resonate, underscoring the vital role of media in shaping public discourse.

New York Times