U.S. Military Intervention in Venezuela: The Capture of Nicolás Maduro

The U.S. military operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has sparked significant political upheaval and concerns about escalating violence in the country. Following the operation, Maduro was taken into U.S. custody, while Vice President Delcy Rodríguez was swiftly sworn in as interim president with U.S. backing. Experts warn that this intervention could create a power vacuum, leading to violent clashes among various armed factions within Venezuela.

Associated PressSeven-day mourning declared in Venezuela after US strike, Delcy Rodriguez seeks Maduro’s returnThe IndependentDaily: What US intervention in Venezuela means for marketsThe Straits TimesUS intervention in Venezuela threatens rules-based global orderTRT World

The military operation resulted in extensive damage to Venezuela's military infrastructure, particularly at Fuerte Tiuna, the largest military complex in Caracas. Satellite images revealed significant destruction, including destroyed buildings and vehicles. Gunfire erupted in Caracas shortly after Maduro's removal, indicating potential clashes between pro-Maduro militias, known as colectivos, and rival security forces. Despite the Venezuelan government's claims of calm, reports of violence and unrest have raised alarms about the stability of the interim government.

New York PostThe IndependentAssociated PressThe Straits TimesSeven-day mourning declared in Venezuela after US strike, Delcy Rodriguez seeks Maduro’s returnTRT WorldNew York Times

Venezuela is home to numerous armed groups, including pro-government militias and Colombian guerrillas, which could exploit the current instability. Robert Pape, a political science professor, emphasized that the country is "primed for violent resistance" against U.S. control over its oil resources. Analysts predict that drug cartels, which operate with extreme violence and disregard for conventional warfare rules, could further complicate the security situation.

The IndependentThe Straits TimesUS intervention in Venezuela threatens rules-based global orderImplications of U.S. intervention in VenezuelaDaily: What US intervention in Venezuela means for marketsAssociated PressSeven-day mourning declared in Venezuela after US strike, Delcy Rodriguez seeks Maduro’s return

The U.S. government, led by President Donald Trump, has stated that it will oversee Venezuela temporarily until a new government is established. Trump indicated that the U.S. could partner with Rodríguez to "make Venezuela great again." In contrast, Rodríguez condemned the U.S. intervention as an "illegitimate military aggression" and called for cooperation based on mutual respect. She also declared a seven-day mourning period for those who died during the operation.

Seven-day mourning declared in Venezuela after US strike, Delcy Rodriguez seeks Maduro’s return

The United Nations has expressed deep concern over the U.S. intervention, arguing that it undermines international law principles regarding state sovereignty. Critics assert that the operation sets a dangerous precedent, allowing military force to be justified under domestic law, which could lead to further violations of international norms. The intervention has been described as a significant departure from established rules governing international conduct.

US intervention in Venezuela threatens rules-based global order

While the Venezuelan government has not released an official death toll from the U.S. operation, reports indicate that at least three officials have been appointed to investigate the "dozens" of deaths. Additionally, the Cuban government claimed that 32 Cuban nationals were killed during the strikes. The lack of clarity surrounding casualties and the overall impact of the intervention highlights the chaotic nature of the situation.

Seven-day mourning declared in Venezuela after US strike, Delcy Rodriguez seeks Maduro’s return

The immediate future of Venezuela remains uncertain, with calls for elections being sidelined by the Trump administration. Experts warn that the removal of Maduro could lead to increased opposition and economic hardships for the Venezuelan population, placing further pressure on the U.S. to manage the fallout. As the situation evolves, the potential for further military action remains a possibility if the interim government does not align with U.S. expectations.

Implications of U.S. intervention in Venezuela

• “Venezuela is primed for violent resistance to the US controlling the oil,” — Robert Pape, Political Science Professor

The Independent

• “If we normalize the kidnapping of a head of state, no country is safe.” — Nicolás Maduro Guerra, Maduro’s Son

Associated Press

• “we invite the US government to collaborate with us on an agenda of cooperation oriented toward shared development within the framework of international law.” — Delcy Rodríguez, Interim President

Daily: What US intervention in Venezuela means for markets