Full Breakdown
SNP Government Appeals to Block Release of Evidence on Sturgeon’s Conduct
1/10/2026, 7:54:04 PM
Legal Challenge Against Information Commissioner
John Swinney, Deputy First Minister of Scotland, has initiated a legal appeal to prevent the release of evidence regarding former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s conduct during the investigation into allegations against Alex Salmond. This appeal follows a ruling by David Hamilton, Scotland’s Information Commissioner, which mandated the Scottish Government to disclose previously withheld information by a specified deadline. The government contends that Hamilton "erred in relation to the law," claiming that releasing the information would constitute "a contempt of court."
Background of the Investigation
The controversy stems from Sturgeon’s testimony during the Holyrood Inquiry into the handling of allegations against Salmond, who faced accusations of sexual misconduct. Hamilton’s investigation concluded that it was up to Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) to determine whether Sturgeon breached the ministerial code, a resignation matter. However, the Scottish Greens supported Sturgeon, allowing her to remain in office despite the inquiry's findings.
Government's Position and Arguments
The Scottish Government has argued that the release of the evidence could lead to the identification of Salmond's accusers, thus justifying their appeal against the Information Commissioner’s decision. In a letter from Lorna Gibbs, Deputy Director at the Scottish Government, it was confirmed that the appeal was lodged with the Court of Session on January 8, 2026. The government maintains that it cannot disclose information that would breach court orders, emphasizing the legal complexities surrounding the case.
Criticism from Opposition Parties
The SNP's decision to pursue this legal battle has drawn significant criticism from opposition parties. Scottish Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser labeled the government's actions as "disgraceful," accusing it of being "addicted to secrecy" and wasting taxpayer money in an attempt to shield Sturgeon from scrutiny. Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry echoed these sentiments, asserting that the truth's emergence would pose challenges for both Sturgeon and Swinney. Alex Neil, a former SNP Health Secretary, criticized the government for undermining the principles of transparency and accountability essential to the Scottish Parliament.
Official Statements and Responses
In response to the ongoing legal proceedings, a spokesperson for the Scottish Government stated, “We consider that the Commissioner erred in relation to the law on whether the information can be withheld because it risks breaching contempt of court orders.” The spokesperson refrained from further comment due to the ongoing litigation.
Conflicting Reports and Gaps
While the Scottish Government insists that releasing the information would breach court orders, critics argue that the government has consistently sought to withhold information from public scrutiny. Hamilton has previously noted the complexities of the case and the government's handling of information requests, highlighting the need for public bodies to justify their decisions transparently.
Verbatim Quotes
- “Scottish Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser said: “The SNP government is addicted to secrecy and will go to any lengths to cover up its wrongdoings.” — Murdo Fraser, Scottish Conservative MSP
- “ Former Nat MP Joanna Cherry added: "Of course they will because if the truth got into the public domain, it would be very difficult for Sturgeon and Swinney not to mention others.” — Joanna Cherry, Former SNP MP
- “This is disgraceful behaviour by the SNP. It’s clear they’ve got a lot to hide! Donald, the founding principles of the Scottish Parliament - openness, transparency and accountability - are being undermined by the SNP government. This is very damaging to the independence cause. Unfortunately too many people put party before cause.” — Alex Neil, Former SNP Health Secretary
The ongoing legal battle reflects broader tensions regarding transparency and accountability within the Scottish Government, as the public awaits the outcome of this appeal.
