The Rise of "Might Makes Right" in Trump's Governance

The Trump administration has increasingly embraced a worldview that prioritizes power over legal frameworks, as articulated by President Donald Trump and his senior advisors. This perspective, often summarized as "might makes right," suggests that both domestic and international laws are irrelevant to those in positions of power.

Alternet

Prominent figures in this narrative include President Donald Trump, who has openly stated that his actions are guided solely by his own morality, dismissing the relevance of international law. Stephen Miller, a senior advisor, echoed this sentiment by asserting that the world operates on principles of strength and force. Additionally, right-wing commentator Matt Walsh has publicly declared international law as "fake and gay," arguing that powerful nations should act according to their interests without regard for legal constraints.

The Bulwark

In a recent interview, Trump stated, "I don’t need international law," emphasizing that his moral compass is the only guide he acknowledges. Walsh's comments further illustrate this ideology, as he justified aggressive actions against foreign leaders like Nicolás Maduro by framing them as necessary for national interests. This rhetoric has been interpreted as a challenge to the established international legal order, suggesting that the powerful can act without accountability.

Alternet

Critics argue that this approach undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent. Brian Finucane, a former attorney in the State Department, highlighted the performative machismo of the administration, suggesting that the disregard for international law is a misguided attempt to assert dominance. He noted that such actions could lead to the erosion of the international legal framework that has historically benefited the United States. Furthermore, commentators have warned that this mindset could extend to domestic laws, where the powerful might feel justified in bypassing legal constraints.

Slate

The implications of this shift are profound. By promoting a narrative where legal frameworks are seen as obstacles to power, the Trump administration risks normalizing a governance style that prioritizes strength over legality. This could lead to a scenario where laws are selectively enforced, favoring those in power while marginalizing the rights of ordinary citizens. The potential for abuse of power is significant, as the administration's actions could embolden similar attitudes in future governance.

The Bulwark

While the administration's stance is clear, there is a lack of consensus on the long-term effects of this ideology on both domestic and international law. Some analysts argue that the erosion of legal norms could destabilize global order, while others believe that the backlash from the international community may reinstate respect for legal frameworks.

The Bulwark

• “'International law' is fake and gay. The only international law is that big and powerful countries get to do what they want,” — Matt Walsh, Right-Wing Commentator

Alternet

• “Trump: I don’t need international law.” — Donald Trump, President of the United States

The Bulwark

• “These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time.” — Stephen Miller, Senior Advisor

Alternet

This evolving narrative around law and power under the Trump administration raises critical questions about the future of governance in the United States and its standing in the global community.

Alternet