Full Breakdown
Former Navy SEAL Convicted for Fireworks Charges Linked to Protest Violence
1/13/2026, 12:28:20 AM
Conviction Details and Charges
Gregory Vandenberg, a 49-year-old former U.S. Navy SEAL, was convicted by a federal jury on charges of transporting explosives with the intent to harm law enforcement during the "No Kings Day" protests in Los Angeles. The jury found him guilty after a five-day trial and approximately three hours of deliberation. Vandenberg was charged with the transportation of explosives with intent to kill, injure, or intimidate, as well as attempting to transport prohibited fireworks into California. He faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
Background of the Incident
The charges stemmed from Vandenberg's actions on June 12, 2025, when he purchased over $50 worth of fireworks at Bowlin's Continental Divide Trading Post in New Mexico. Store employees testified that Vandenberg expressed intentions to throw the fireworks at police officers during the upcoming protests. Following his purchase, employees alerted law enforcement due to his alarming comments and behavior. Vandenberg was subsequently arrested in Arizona, where federal agents discovered clothing and materials associated with extremist ideologies, including antisemitic symbols and references to militant groups.
Trial Proceedings and Defense
During the trial, Vandenberg's defense team argued that he was a man known for dark humor and that his statements were exaggerated by store employees. They contended that the prosecution relied heavily on ambiguous evidence, including silent surveillance footage and witness testimonies that lacked consistency. The defense also highlighted Vandenberg's military background, suggesting that he would not resort to using commercial fireworks for violence.
The prosecution, however, maintained that Vandenberg's intent was clear, citing his inquiries about the fireworks' explosive capabilities and his expressed desire to harm law enforcement. They emphasized that while individuals have the right to express their beliefs, using explosives to intimidate or threaten others is unacceptable.
Official Statements and Responses
Acting U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison stated, “People in this country are free to hold their own beliefs and to express them peacefully. What they are not free to do is use explosives to threaten or terrorize others.” This sentiment was echoed by U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi, who remarked on Vandenberg's alleged intentions to exploit the protests for violent purposes.
Criticism and Opposition
Vandenberg's defense team expressed disappointment with the jury's verdict, asserting that the case was built on unreliable testimony. They indicated plans to evaluate post-trial and appellate options, emphasizing their belief in Vandenberg's innocence and the questionable nature of the evidence presented.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
There were discrepancies in witness testimonies regarding Vandenberg's statements at the fireworks store. While some employees claimed he expressed a desire to "kill" officers, others later clarified that he did not use that specific language. Additionally, the defense questioned the thoroughness of the FBI's investigation, particularly regarding the retrieval of audio from the store's security cameras.
What's Next
Vandenberg remains in custody pending sentencing, which has yet to be scheduled. The case highlights the implications of local retail transactions in federal prosecutions and raises concerns about the intersection of free speech and public safety in politically charged environments.
