Story perspectives

DOJ Backs Halligan Amid Unlawful Appointment Ruling

1/14/2026

Summary

Story summary

Lindsey Halligan, the United States attorney for Eastern District of Virginia, appointed by President Donald Trump, faces a ruling that her appointment was unlawful.
Halligan argues she retains the right to use her title despite the ruling.
The Department of Justice backs Halligan and accuses Judge David Novak of coercing the Executive Branch.
The DOJ appeals the decision nullifying Halligan's indictments against James Comey and Letitia James, maintaining its position.

History

Historical Context

The 1974 Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Nixon established that no one, including the President, is above the law, compelling Nixon to release tapes related to the Watergate scandal. This decision led to Nixon's resignation on August 9, 1974, and set a precedent for presidential accountability, influencing ongoing legal battles over executive power, such as Lindsey Halligan's current case against Judge Novak.

1 of 2

Story summary

Lindsey Halligan, the United States attorney for Eastern District of Virginia, appointed by President Donald Trump, faces a ruling that her appointment was unlawful.
Halligan argues she retains the right to use her title despite the ruling.
The Department of Justice backs Halligan and accuses Judge David Novak of coercing the Executive Branch.
The DOJ appeals the decision nullifying Halligan's indictments against James Comey and Letitia James, maintaining its position.

1 / 2