Full Breakdown
Wisconsin Assembly Advances Constitutional Amendments and Child Grooming Legislation
1/15/2026, 6:43:40 AM
Proposed Constitutional Amendments
The Wisconsin Assembly has approved two significant constitutional amendments that could be presented to voters in November. The first amendment, known as the “Equality Amendment,” aims to prohibit government entities from discriminating against or granting preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, education, contracting, or administration. This proposal passed with a 54-45 vote, primarily supported by Republicans, who argue it will enhance fairness in state practices. However, critics, including Rep. Andrew Hysell, D-Sun Prairie, warn that it could hinder efforts to support marginalized groups.
The second amendment seeks to protect the right to gather in places of worship during emergencies, a response to restrictions imposed by Governor Tony Evers' administration during the COVID-19 pandemic. This measure also passed with Republican support, alongside two Democratic votes. Proponents, such as Rep. Ron Tusler, R-Harrison, assert that it safeguards First Amendment rights, while opponents express concerns about public health implications.
Legislative Response to Child Grooming
In addition to the constitutional amendments, the Assembly passed a bill defining and criminalizing "grooming" of children, which aims to address inappropriate interactions between educators and students. Authored by Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, the legislation categorizes grooming as a felony, particularly when it involves predatory behavior with the intent of sexual contact. The bill received overwhelming support, passing 93-6, with only Democratic opposition. Nedweski emphasized the need for clear legal definitions to protect children from exploitation.
Legislative Context and Criticism
The Assembly's actions also include a bill responding to the case of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan, who was suspended for obstructing federal immigration enforcement. This new legislation would pause the pay of judges suspended due to criminal allegations. Critics, including Rep. Andrew Hysell, argue that the bill is more about political messaging than fiscal responsibility, as it would not have saved taxpayer money in Dugan's case.
Official Statements & Responses
Rep. David Murphy, R-Hortonville, co-author of the “Equality Amendment,” stated, “This is what we’re trying to bring to all aspects of the state of Wisconsin — the ability to have merit, fairness, and equality determine how things are done.” Conversely, Rep. Margaret Arney, D-Wauwatosa, expressed concern that the amendments would undermine support for marginalized students, stating, “We need to do more to have Black and brown kids succeed in Wisconsin, not less.”
What's Next
Both constitutional amendments will undergo a second consideration in the state Senate. If approved, they will be placed on the ballot for voter referendum in November. The grooming legislation is also set to advance, with discussions ongoing regarding its implications for school communication policies.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
While the Assembly's actions have garnered significant attention, there are differing opinions on the potential impacts of the proposed amendments. Some lawmakers believe the amendments could inadvertently restrict necessary support for marginalized communities, while others maintain that they will promote fairness and equality in state governance. The debate continues as the Senate prepares to review the proposals.
