Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Legislative Push Against ICE Hiring in Washington State

1/23/2026, 2:01:38 AM

Overview of the ICE Out Act of 2026

Washington state Representative Tarra Simmons has introduced the ICE Out Act of 2026, legislation aimed at prohibiting state law enforcement agencies from hiring individuals who have served as sworn officers of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) since January 20, 2025. This bill is a response to concerns about the tactics employed by ICE agents during the Trump administration, which Simmons describes as violent and inhumane. The proposed law is intended to foster trust between law enforcement and communities, emphasizing the need for officers who respect and uphold community standards.

Legislative Intent and Community Impact

Simmons, who has a background in criminal justice reform, argues that the presence of former ICE agents in state law enforcement could undermine the progress made in building community trust. "The last thing we need is infiltration of ICE agents trained during the Trump Administration to send us backwards," she stated. The bill, if enacted, would take effect on October 1, 2026, and aims to ensure that law enforcement personnel are aligned with community values rather than perceived as an "occupying force."

Criticism and Opposition

The bill has faced criticism from various quarters. Jason Rantz, a radio host, labeled Simmons's proposal as hypocritical, pointing out her past felony convictions and her advocacy for the hiring of formerly incarcerated individuals. He argued that it is unjust to discriminate against law-abiding citizens who wish to serve in law enforcement. This sentiment reflects a broader debate within the state regarding the balance between community safety and the perceived overreach of federal immigration enforcement.

Broader Legislative Context

In a related legislative effort, Representative Delia Ramirez of Illinois plans to introduce a bill that would financially restrict the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) ability to detain or monitor immigrants. This proposal aims to redirect funds from detention centers to community health and social services. Ramirez's initiative highlights a growing trend among Democrats to push back against ICE and DHS, particularly in light of recent incidents involving immigration enforcement.

Public Sentiment and Future Implications

Public sentiment appears to be shifting, with increasing support for measures that restrict ICE's operations. Recent polling indicates that more individuals now favor abolishing ICE than maintaining it, reflecting a significant change since 2018. However, some Democratic strategists caution against using the "Abolish ICE" rhetoric, suggesting it could detract from the focus on reforming the agency. Ramirez maintains that her proposal does not compromise border security and emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to law enforcement.

Verbatim Quotes

  • "In this Washington, we have worked incredibly hard to build trust between law enforcement and community." — Tarra Simmons, Washington State Representative
  • "This bill is designed to prevent those sorts of dangerous tactics from becoming part of the culture of policing in Washington state." — Tarra Simmons
  • "What do they say: ‘What the hell is Congress doing? Why won’t they stand up for us?'" — Delia Ramirez, U.S. Representative

Conclusion

The introduction of the ICE Out Act of 2026 by Tarra Simmons represents a significant legislative effort to reshape the relationship between law enforcement and immigration enforcement in Washington state. As public opinion continues to evolve, the implications of such measures could have lasting effects on immigration policy and community relations across the United States.