Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Insanity Defense Highlights Disturbing Murder Trials in 2022

1/24/2026

37 2 Full Breakdown

Center

Maupai Acquitted Insanity

Patrick Maupai, a Dumont man, was found not guilty by reason of insanity for killing his mother with a fire poker in 2022 after a bench trial.
In a separate case, a woman in Co Clare is on trial for the attempted murder of her daughter, who suffered 70 stab wounds.
The defense says she was mentally ill, while a forensic psychiatrist testified she was aware of her actions.

Right

Natarajan Pleads Not Guilty

Priyatharsini Natarajan, a Hillsborough mother, has pleaded not guilty to double murder charges.
Two boys, aged 5 and 7, were found dead in their home with signs of strangulation.
Natarajan's husband reported her confession to police after discovering the bodies.
Investigators said she was in a hyper state amid the local school community's mourning.
Natarajan's next court appearance is scheduled for February 27.

History

Historical Context

The M'Naghten Rule, established in 1843 after Daniel M'Naghten's acquittal for murder due to insanity, set a legal precedent for the insanity defense in England. This ruling has influenced numerous cases, including those of Patrick Maupai and Priyatharsini Natarajan, highlighting ongoing debates about mental health and accountability in the legal system, which continue to shape public perception and legal standards today.

1 of 3

Maupai Acquitted Insanity

Patrick Maupai, a Dumont man, was found not guilty by reason of insanity for killing his mother with a fire poker in 2022 after a bench trial.
In a separate case, a woman in Co Clare is on trial for the attempted murder of her daughter, who suffered 70 stab wounds.
The defense says she was mentally ill, while a forensic psychiatrist testified she was aware of her actions.

1 / 3