Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Iran Demands Clarity from IAEA on Inspections of Bombed Nuclear Sites

1/24/2026, 7:27:18 AM

Core Event: Iran's Stance on IAEA Inspections

Iran's government has called for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to clarify its position regarding the U.S. and Israeli military strikes on its nuclear facilities before allowing inspections of the damaged sites. Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), emphasized that inspections should not proceed without defined technical and safety protocols, particularly given the potential environmental risks associated with military attacks.

Background & Context: Military Strikes and Nuclear Oversight

In June 2022, U.S. and Israeli forces conducted airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites: Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. Since then, the IAEA has been unable to inspect these bombed facilities, focusing instead on the 13 other declared nuclear sites in Iran that were not targeted. The lack of access to the damaged sites has raised concerns about the oversight of Iran's nuclear activities, particularly regarding its stock of highly enriched uranium.

Official Statements & Responses

Rafael Grossi, the IAEA Director General, stated that the ongoing standoff over inspections "cannot go on forever." He noted that Iran must submit a report detailing the status of the bombed sites and the nuclear material involved. Grossi has not condemned the military strikes but has expressed the need for Iran to engage with the agency to ensure compliance with the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Eslami criticized Grossi for succumbing to pressure from the U.S. and Israel, asserting that the IAEA's actions have been influenced by external factors rather than objective oversight.

Criticism & Opposition: Iranian Concerns

Iranian officials have voiced strong objections to the IAEA's current approach. Eslami described the agency's failure to establish clear inspection guidelines as "unrealistic, unprofessional, and unfair." He highlighted that inspections have only been conducted at undamaged sites, which he argues does not provide a comprehensive understanding of Iran's nuclear capabilities. Furthermore, Iran's proposal to prohibit attacks on nuclear facilities was reportedly ignored during the IAEA's General Conference.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

There is a notable discrepancy regarding the timeline and conditions for inspections. While Grossi has indicated that the IAEA has conducted inspections at non-targeted sites, Eslami maintains that no inspections have occurred at the bombed facilities due to the lack of a defined framework. Additionally, Grossi's comments suggest a potential timeline for resolution, stating that the situation cannot continue indefinitely, yet no specific deadlines have been established.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “The agency has to clarify its position regarding the military attacks on the nuclear facilities that have been registered by the agency and are under its supervision so we can understand what role they play,” — Mohammad Eslami, Head of AEOI
  • “This cannot go on forever because at some point, I will have to say, 'Well, I don't have any idea where this material is,'” — Rafael Grossi, IAEA Director General
  • “It is unrealistic, unprofessional and unfair that, because of pressure from Israel and the US, he [Grossi] is putting pressure on us,” — Mohammad Eslami, Head of AEOI

What's Next: Future Engagements

Looking ahead, Grossi is expected to meet with Iranian officials to discuss the ongoing inspection issues. The outcome of these discussions may determine the future of IAEA inspections in Iran and the broader implications for international nuclear oversight.