Full Breakdown
Costco Faces Lawsuit Over 'No Preservatives' Claim for Rotisserie Chickens
1/25/2026, 8:03:47 PM
Allegations of False Advertising
A proposed class action lawsuit has been filed against Costco in San Diego federal court, alleging that the company falsely advertises its Kirkland Signature Seasoned Rotisserie Chicken as containing "no preservatives." The lawsuit, initiated by plaintiffs Anatasia Chernov from Escondido and Bianca Johnston from Big Bear, claims that despite these assertions, the chickens contain additives such as sodium phosphate and carrageenan. The plaintiffs argue that they would not have purchased the product had they been aware of these additives and contend that Costco has misled consumers, potentially costing them "tens -- if not hundreds -- of millions of dollars" in the process.
Background of the Case
The lawsuit was filed on Thursday and highlights a significant discrepancy between Costco's marketing claims and the actual ingredients listed on the product. The plaintiffs assert that the clear and prominent claim of "No Preservatives" is misleading, as it contradicts the ingredient list provided by Costco. This case raises questions about the legality and ethics of food labeling practices in the retail industry.
Key Figures Involved
- Anatasia Chernov: Plaintiff from Escondido, California.
- Bianca Johnston: Plaintiff from Big Bear, California.
- Wesley M. Griffith: Attorney representing the plaintiffs, who emphasizes the reliance consumers place on clear labeling when making food choices.
Official Statements & Responses
Wesley M. Griffith stated, "Consumers reasonably rely on clear, prominent claims like 'No Preservatives,' especially when deciding what they and their families will eat. Costco's own ingredient list contradicts its marketing. That's unlawful, and it's unfair." This statement underscores the plaintiffs' position that Costco's advertising practices are misleading.
Criticism & Opposition
While the lawsuit presents a strong case against Costco, the company has not yet publicly responded to the allegations. Critics of the lawsuit may argue that consumers should be responsible for reading ingredient labels, suggesting that the presence of additives may not be surprising in processed foods.
What's Next
The lawsuit is in its early stages, and further developments are expected as Costco prepares its defense. The outcome could have implications for food labeling standards and consumer protection laws, particularly regarding claims made by large retailers.
Verbatim Quotes
- “Consumers reasonably rely on clear, prominent claims like 'No Preservatives,' especially when deciding what they and their families will eat. Costco's own ingredient list contradicts its marketing. That's unlawful, and it's unfair.” — Wesley M. Griffith, Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
